A superstring of discrete energy permittivity is the smallest physical phenomenology that is of a "package' of what may be thought of as a single unit of a fractal of magnetism. You can not have a fraction of discrete energy. Yet, there is a basically endless variety of phenomenology that is smaller in the correlative scalar amplitude of its size, that works to help form those superstrings that are the smallest "packages" of energy that are actually what we may term of as energy. But, due to the nature of those eigenstates of a metrical-gauge-based nature that are smaller in physical sized than superstrings of discrete energy -- we tend to only notice as the smallest substringular phenomenology, as the existence of superstrings. Likewise, the smallest "package" of time that may be either termed of or thought of as time, is an instanton. Just as one cannot have a fraction of discrete energy -- when in terms of any respective given Hodge-based-index, of as to any correlative scalar magnitude of discrete energy permittivity -- one cannot have a fraction of time that is smaller than an instanton. YET, there is basically an endless variety of phenomenological-based durations -- that are smaller in scalar amplitude than that of an instanton. But, given the nature of those gauge-metrical-based periods that are briefer than the duration of discrete time, -- we only tend to notice the passage of the sequential series of instantons, as the flow of the smallest individual "packages" of time that are actually of "time." Let me explain it in the following manner, as a metaphorical example that may make this clearer.: Let us think of a "cartoon" as a relatively decent metaphor, for as to being of the flow of discrete energy over discrete time. As we are viewing the metaphorical cartoon, we only tend to notice the sequential series of the delineated flow of the discrete individual pages of that cartoon -- as what may here be considered as to be symbolic of the fact that we only notice -- as an extrapolation of energy -- in so as to be the individual superstrings, their correlative counterstrings, their correlative Fadeev-Popov-Trace eigenstates, and their correlative light-cone-gauge eigenstates, -- as the respectively smallest existent "packages" of the respective particle-based discrete energy permittiivty, the correlative wave-functionability of discrete energy permittivity, the correlative particle-based discrete energy impedance, and the correlative wave-functionability of discrete energy impedance. Again, in the Metphorical cartoon example that I have used here, one only notices as discrete durations -- the individual durations in which the so-stated sequential series of the individual pages that come together in so as to work to comprise the said Metaphorical flow, of what would here work to comprise the so-stated venue of the said Metaphorical cartoon. Yet, in a cartoon -- there may be phenomenology that is existent in-between the individual discrete pages of the said cartoon, -- as well as there are durations that exist in-between the individual discrete periods of as to when the sequential series of the said pages of the said cartoon are to here be shown. Yet, due to the nature of the stuff that may be shown in-between the individual pages of the cartoon & yet, as well, due to the nature of the periods that may be present in-between those durations in which the so-stated pages are shown, in so as to work to form the so-stated cartoon -- one will tend to only notice the sequential series of the pages that work to comprise the said cartoon -- as to be during when these pages are to be shown, when the cartoon is done. Likewise -- due to the nature of those metrical-gauge-based phenomenology that are smaller than the smallest increments of energy, As Well as due to the nature of those gauge-metrical-based phenomenology that are smaller than the smallest increments of time -- such phenomenology that work to come together in so as to work to form discrete energy and time, do not tend to be directly detected upon the activity of what would here tend to be extrapolated. This helps to explain as to how a quantum leap may be logically thought of as happening. As the holonomic substrate of a substringular phenomnology appears to immediately be translated from one spot to another without any of the said entity of holonomic substrate being translated here in-between the two so-eluded-to endpoints -- this is due to the condition that there is a generally unnoticed duration of Ultimon Flow that happens in-between each successive group-related instanton that we are able to directly detect. We only tend to notice the sequential series of instantons, in which discrete energy is to flow through. During the successive series of the generally unnoticed durations of Ultimon Flow -- the ensuing substringular delineations are encoded for. During the duration that I have so-termed of as SETS -- the ensuing substringular delineations of discrete energy are then more specifically encoded for. During what I term of as the ensuing discrete increment of the instanton-quaternionic-field-impulse-mode, which is at the "tail-end" of the generally unnoticed duration of Ultimon Flow -- the ensuing substringular delineations are brought into where these are to be iterated at. Since relatively organized physical existence is only iterated as discrete energy -- that happens at each successive iteration of group-related instanton -- we tend to literally only notice as phenomenology to be of the successive iterations of discrete energy, through the metric of discrete time. So, when there is one second happening -- there are 10^43 discrete increments of generally noticed Ultimon Flow and 10^43 discrete increments of generally unnoticed Ultimon Flow. Why this does not work to form 2*10^43 discrete increments instead, is on account of the condition that we are made of a composition of discrete energy that flows during discrete time.
I will continue with the suspense later! To Be Continued! Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.
No comments:
Post a Comment