Part One As to Displacement Magnitudes

How about if I explain to you a little bit about more as to  how superstrings of discrete energy permittivity kinematically differentiate at a displacement magnitude, which is relatively large in scalar amount in the substringular -- yet works to bear a Yakawa-based spatial condition that is so close in proximal covariant-based locus in the globally distinguishable, that the said codeterminable and codifferentiable superstrings act as if these so-stated superstrings are adjacent -- to the extrapolation of any given person that were to work to detect the general locus of the said group of superstrings, over a sequential series of group-based instantons?!  Let us say, in this just-eluded-to scenario, that we are dealing with a Hodge-Index of 10 million superstrings of discrete energy permittivity.  Let us now say that all of these corroberative superstrings are all initially within the same general distribution of tori-sector-based-range -- all 10 million of such so-stated superstrings are of the same layer of reality, that is likewise of the same set of parallel universes.  As all of these given arbitrary superstrings of this so-eluded-to group of strings are struck by alterior-based photons over the directly associated group metric, in which the here discussed scenario is kinematically differentiable, the counterstrings of the so-struck superstrings -- which act as the wave-based holonomic substrate of the corroberative so-eluded-to set of discrete energy increments -- such a wave-based pattern of covariant interactive mobility will then here begin to form a fractal of a covalent sharing of their Hamiltonian-based operational indices -- with the immediately surrounding superstrings.  This will work to form a repulsion factor that will here operate in-between the interial Ward-Neumman bounds of the initially so-stated 10 million covariant superstrings -- that I had mentioned at the beginning of the scenario of this post -- which will work to make it appear, from the vantage-point of the globally distinguishable, that the operational function of all of the so-stated intially mentioned superstrings will be of a different general nature.   Yet, when one is to consider the overall resultant kinematic activity of the so-eluded-to 10 million superstrings, over a relatively less transient sequential series of group-interactive instantons, the Hamiltonian operation of this so-stated given arbitrary scenario of multiple small Hamiltonian-based operators will here integrate, in so as to form a group operational function that works to form a more similar general nature -- when one will here consider the here implied conformally invariant pattern activity, that one may describe as a given arbitrary case of covariant determinism.  I will continue with the suspense later!  Sam Roach.