Saturday, December 20, 2014

Some More As To Lorentz-Four-Contractions

When a phenomenon travels closer to the speed of light -- from the underside of the said speed of light -- the so-stated phenomenon undergoes what are termed of as a certain degree of Lorentz-Four-Contraction.  When any given arbitrary phenomenon is not moving in a tachyonic-based nature, it is undergoing what may be termed of as a Noether-based flow.  So, what works to distinguish the various degrees of relative velocities, for any given arbitrary phenomenon that is moving?  I will here give a little bit of an explanation as to this.  When a phenomenon is at a relative stand-still, the substringular aspects of this so-stated given arbitrary phenomenology is in a state of superconformal invariance.  This just-eluded-to condition of superconformal invariance is a manner here in which the superstrings  -- that work to comprise the phenomenon that we are discussing here, move in a kinematic manner that is completely in static equilibrium.  This is to where the directly corresponding superstrings move around, over the here implied sequential series of instantons, yet, these superstrings amount to no alteration in the general eigenbase of their integrative Hodge-based locus, over the so-eluded-to time period -- in which the directly associated phenomenon is moving at a standstill in the globally distinguishable.  When such a manner of superconformal invariance is applied to a said respective given arbitrary phenomenon, there are no overt Lorentz-Four-Contractions here acting upon the said phenomenon, and thus, the degree of Polyakov Action in this case is of a fully reverse-compactified manner when taken to the inverse of the absence of the so-stated Lorentz-Four-Contractions.  The less of a degree of such a so-eluded-to manner of conformal invariance, that there is upon the said phenomenon that we are discussing here -- the more that the said globally distinguishable phenomenon will then here be moving at what may be termed of as being of a higher velocity -- to where the so-mentioned phenomenon will then bear more of a Lorentz-Four-Contraction, over time.  The greater the Lorentz-Four-Contraction is upon a given arbitrary physical phenomenon, the lower the relative degree is upon the directly corresponding Polyakov Action for that so-stated phenomenon, during the directly appertaining individual group-related instantons.  Let us now say that a one-dimensional superstring is  Lorentz-Four-Contracted by a factor of 10.  Its conformal dimension will then technically be 2^((3*10^7)/(10^43)).  Anything to the zero power is one -- so, this would here be pretty close to exactly one.  Let us now say that the said one-dimensional superstring is now LFC by a factor of 3*(10^7).  Its conformal dimension will then here be 2^((10/(10^43)).  This would then mean that the superstrings under the two different respective conditions will bear 3*10^7 of what I have termed of as  partitions in the first case, and, 10 as what I have termed of as partitions in the second case.  I will continue with the suspense later!  To Be Continued!  Sam Roach.

No comments: