Some Stuff As To The Motion of Gauge-Bosons

As the Polyakov Action is happening to one given arbitrary superstring -- as the so-stated superstring is expanding, during a given arbitrary duration of BRST --  toward the inverse extent that it is Lorentz-Four-Contracting to -- the directly corresponding gauge-bosons, that pluck to directly associated second-ordered light-cone-gauge eigenstates, in so as to form Schwinger Indices, are being redistributed in a such a manner, in so that these may remain along with the correlative respective mini-string segments that these so-eluded-to heterotic strings are being directly associated with -- as the said gauge-bosons work to form vibrational-based oscillations, via their motion upon the topological surface of the so-eluded-to holonomic substrate of the directly corresponding light-cone-gauge eigenstates.  Since any given arbitrary superstring that is Lorentz-Four-Contracted will tend to reverse-expand, over the course of BRST, to the inverse extent that such a superstring appears, in the globally distinguishable, to be contracted,  such a superstring will do such an expansion of their core-field-density in such a manner in so that it is internally homeomorphic during the directly related general genus of such a Clifford Expansion.  Such a homeomorphic expansion will tend to be trivially isomorphic from the vantage-point of a central conipoint.  This will mean that the gauge-bosons that are timelessly positioned at the start of BRST in a relatively norm-to-holomorphic vantage-point -- when this is taken in comparison to other of such gauge-bosons -- will often work to tend to cause the concavity of the so-eluded-to covariant-based second-ordered light-cone-gauge eigenstates to be comparitively of a reverse-isomorphic manner.  This will then mean that the so-eluded-to second-ordered Schwinger-Indices that are thus formed by the two just mentioned different geni of topological holonomic substrate will bear a covariant-based inverse-relation to the wave-tug/wave-pull of the parity that these will bear, when these are delineated upon the correlative Rarita Structure eigenbase -- which works to form a fractaled tense of two different wave-based indices that bear a Njenhuis relationship to one another.  Such a relationhship helps to inter-relate the Real Reimmanian eigenbase of the wave-functionability of any given arbitrary superstring of discrete energy permittivity with the Real Reimmanian eigenbase of the wave-funcionabilty of any other given arbitrary superstring of discrete energy permittivity, when one considers the correlative kinematic-based Ward-Caucy bounds of such generally considered superstrings, over time.  I will continue with the suspense later!  Sam.