As To A Special Tritiary Abelian Wave-Tug/Wave-Pull

Let us here consider a certain general genus of a tritiary abelian wave-tug/wave-pull, that is physically embodied by an organized working-together of the holonomic substrate of three individual interdependent cohomological-based substringular projections -- that work to bear a group-based bonding at a conipoint, that would here function at the apex of the so-stated kinematic-based physical substringular conipoint -- at the front of what may be termed of here as the holomorphic end of the so-stated respective given arbitrary cohomological-based projection.  There are, in this scenario, three orbifolds, that function in so as to bear a Hamiltonian-based operation, as an orbifold eigenset, that works to form a Gliossi wave-tug/wave-pull at a general apex-like conipoint -- at the relative forward-holomoprhic end of the said substringular projection, as a general format of such a Laplacian-based superstringular scenario.  The so-eluded-to apex-based Laplacian Ward-Neumman condition that I have just implied, will bear a discrete genus of an abelian differential geometry -- this so-eluded-to kinematic format of a movement of the said projection, of which, works to bear a unitary orbifold-based wave permittivity -- that moves in the eluded-to relative forward-holomorphic directoral-based flow, over a sequential series of group instantons.  In so long as the vibrational oscillation of the directly corresponding Hamiltonian-based operation does not either ellongate nor attenuate in its kinematic-based pulsation, over time, such an eluded-to Fourier Transformation of the here mentioned tritiary cohomological-based projection -- that here is transferred through the eluded-to unitary Lagrangian, over time, will tend to bear no spontaneous Chern-Simmons singularites, at the Fourier-based kinematic substringular locus of the time-wise differential conipoint -- where the conipoint of the correlative apex of the three said cohomological-based projections, is spatially differentiated -- over the correlative integration of the directly corresponding sequential series of group-based instantons.  Such an extrapolation of a kinematically depicted Sterling approximation will then here tend to bear a local relative respective given arbitrary tense of being Yau-Exact, when this is not here considering any extraneous alterior conditions, that would otherwise work to effect the overall scenario here.  Yet, when one considers the kinematic-based activity that acts toward the relatively reverse-holomorphic direction -- when taken as away from the so-eluded-to apex-based conipoint that I have mentioned here -- there will, instead, tend to be Lagrangian-based Chern-Simmmons singularities -- due to the so-implied warping of space-time-fabric, that would tend to eminently happen, in so long as the curvature of the here mentioned tritiary projection bears any spurious changes in derivative over time.   The more spurious the tendency of the reverse-holomorphic-taken cohomological indices -- that exist in the opposite direction from the directoral wave-tug/wave-pull of the apex of the said tritiary abelian motion, through the said unitary Lagrangian, are, the more likely that there will be the existence of at least some sort of Chern-Simmons singularities at the vantage-point of such a kinematically differenatiable general locus -- as taken away from the locus of the said Gliossi-based binding, of the so-eluded-to apex that will have here inter-binded, prior to the motion of the said cohomological projection.  To Be Continued!  Sam.