Thursday, July 18, 2013

More About Non-Orientable Superstrings

When a superstring is not orientable during the course of a gauge-metric of the Bette Action during the directly corresponding duration of an iteration of BRST, the condition as to what the source of the lack of orientation is from works to determine whether or not the said superstring will be able to be orientable over the course of the ensuing Regge Action or not.  If a given arbitrary superstring is not orientable over the said course of a Bette Action eigenmetric -- due to what I described yesterday as a spurious course of motion that would here work to cause a lack of homeomorphicity during the said Bette Action eigenmetric, then, it is at least possible that the ensuing corresponding Regge Action eigenmetric may possibly cause the directly related superstring to become orientable under a certain set of arbitrary circumstances.  Such circumstances would be a group attractor semigroup that may often act upon the given arbitrary superstring, in such a manner in so as to cause its vibratorial oscillation over the given mentioned Regge Action eigenmetric to change in vibration genus, from an anharmonic mode of parity in-between the directly corresponding superstring and its counterpart to a harmonic mode of parity in-between the directly corresponding superstring and its counterpart.  This is not to be confused with the genus of parity of the unitary-based oscillation of the first-ordered point particles with themselves that work to comprise a given arbitrary superstring -- that would here, under a previously mentioned different case from this, not consider the covariant inter-relationship of the vibration of the said superstring with its counterstring.  Yet, if the given arbitrary superstring mentioned here bears a non-metrical Chern-Simmons-related singularity, or, occasionally a set of such directly related singularities, over the course of a Bette Action eigenmetric, then, the ensuing Regge Action eigenmetric that directly corresponds to the inter-relationship of a given superstring with its counterstring will not cause the said superstring to be orientable -- whether or not there is a spurious alteration that is due to a metrical-based perturbation in the motion of the said superstring over the course of a corresponding duration of BRST (over the simultaneous Bette Action eigenmetric and Polyakov Acton eigenmetric that would correspond here).  I will continue with the suspense later!  Sam.

No comments: