Tuesday, July 9, 2013

A Correction As To Conformal Dimensionality

First of all, an ansantz to anyone who knows very much about math -- anything to the zero power is 1.
So, the conformal dimension of a one-dimensional superstring of discrete energy permittivity is:
0+ 2^((3*10^8)/(10^43)) to 0+ 2^((1)/(10^43)), which is just over 1 (yet about 1) -- while the conformal dimension of a two-dimensional superstring of discrete energy permittivity is:
1+ 2^((6*10^8)/(10^43)), which is just over 2 (yet about 2).
This is because a one-dimensional superstring of discrete energy permittivity needs to be at least 1 in order to define a dimensionality that is not pointal-based, yet, the conformal dimension of such a superstring can not be exactly one on account of the condition of their discrepencies.  Likewise, a two-dimensional superstring of discrete energy permittivity that is two-dimensional needs to be at least two in order to define a dimensionality that is bears a widthwise flatspace, yet, again, the conformal dimension of such a superstring can not be exactly two on account of the condition of their discrepencies. The conformal dimension -- as to exactly what it is considered during specific cases -- depends upon how many partitions that are imbued upon the said given arbitrary superstring.
So, for one-dimensional superstrings, the conformal dimension is more specifically:
0+ (2 (to the # of discrepencies (partitions) that exist for the said string during the Polyakov Action during a given arbitrary metric of BRST)/10^43)), and, the conformal dimension for two-dimensional superstrings of discrete energy is, more specifically; 1+ (2(to the # of discrepencies (partitions) that exist for the said string during the Polyakov Action during a given arbitrary metric of BRST)/10^43).
Just a tid-bit to help the reader! To Be Continued!  Sincerely, Sam Roach.

No comments: