Let us initially consider two different mass-bearing cohesive sets of discrete energy quanta, that are here to be gyrating — over the metric span of a rotational closed circuitry. One of such cohesive sets of discrete energy, is to be transferred at a vantage-point of a reference-frame, that is here to be external from the Poincare level of the kinematic proximal local covariant mappable locus, that is here to be of the said cohesive set of energy, via the general kinetic processes of a Floer-Homology; whereas, the other of such cohesive sets of discrete energy, is to be transferred at a vantage-point of a reference-frame, that is here to be external from the Poincare level of the kinematic proximal local covariant mappable locus, of the said cohesive set fo energy, via the general kinetic processes of a homology-related topological manifold, that is Not of the nature of acting as a Floer-homology. Otherwise; the two different and distinct said sets of energy, are here to behave in pretty-much the same general type of a manner. That mass-bearing cohesive set of discrete energy quanta, that is here to be externally transported in a kinetic manner, over a correlative duration of a discrete amount of time —via the general processes of a Floer-homology, will tend to bear a greater tendency of acting as being Gliosis to the Kahler-Metric — than that other mentioned (inferred) mass-bearing cohesive set of discrete energy quanta, that is, instead, to be transported in such a manner, that is here to Not be done, via the general processes of a Floer-Homology. To Be Continued! Sincerely, SAM ROACH. (1989.)
No comments:
Post a Comment