Let us say, one were to have a situation, to where there were to be two different case scenarios — that were each to work to bear the general condition, of two different relatively macroscopic tenses of electrical cycling, by which, each of such individually taken case scenarios, were to work to involve the motion of one distinct electron, per each so-inferred individually taken case. Each of these electrons, was to be moving at Exactly the same covariant-related rate of speed — in its relation to the motion of electromagnetic energy. This is to where — one is to have a situation, to where one of such electrical cyclings, works to involve an electron, that is to simply be reverberating in a back-and-forth manner (via the distance of one meter of length, back-and-forth); whereas, in the other given case scenario, the electron is to be orbiting in its path, in a relatively circular manner (in which the circumference of the herein inferred cyclical path, is to incur a spatial distance of one meter). Since the electrical cycling — that is here to be of an orbital nature — is to be altering more often in its direction, in its relation to the motion of electromagnetic energy, such a said tense of electrical cycling, will consequently tend to bear a greater scalar amplitude of a perturbation in its Chern-Simons Invariants, when this is here to be taken over the conditions, of a time-related piece-wise continuous function. (Please keep in mind, again, that Chern-Simons Invariants are only “Invariant,” when both the rate, as well as the direction, of a cohesive set of discrete energy quanta, is to stay the same, in its relation to electromagnetic energy.) This just mentioned tendency, will consequently tend to result, — in the general condition, — by which the Circular tense of electrical cycling, will thereby tend to bear a greater tense of a net magnetic generation, than the other tense of electron cycling will. SAM.
No comments:
Post a Comment