Let us initially consider two different yet distinct mass-bearing cohesive sets of discrete energy quanta, that are both here, to act as being Yukawa to the Kahler-Metric. Let us next consider, in this particular case scenario, that both of such discrete sets of energy quanta, are here to each work to bear a mathematically configured mappable-tracing of cohomology-related index, to where the holonomic substrate of the mathematically determined cohomology, may be described at a given arbitrary Laplacian-based locus, when one is to work to mathematically determine, what the thence proximal local latent eigenstate of cohomology is to be — at the inferred given arbitrary Laplacian-related locus. Now, temporarily to go back to a little bit “before”; Both of such inferred sets of discrete energy, are to basically be behaving in the same manner, except that one of these two said cohesive sets of discrete energy quanta, is here to act as being Gliosis to the Kahler-Metric, whereas, the other of these two said cohesive sets of discrete energy quanta, is here to Not act as being Gliosis to the Kahler-Metric. That said set of discrete energy quanta, of the two — that is here to act as being GLIOSIS to the Kahler-Metric — will consequently Tend to result in working to display a deeper scalar amplitude of a Kahler-based quotient, than the other said set of discrete energy quanta, — that is here to Not act, as being Gliosis to the Kathler-Metric. This tendency, is in so long as that the motion of both of these two mentioned mass-bearing cohesive sets of discrete energy quanta, are to simultaneously be occurring, (via the “perspective” of a central coni-point), over a relatively transient duration of discrete time, via the course of an evenly-gauged Hamiltonian eigen-metric. Sincerely, SAMUEL ROACH. (1989).
No comments:
Post a Comment