Theoretically, the solution to e^(2piI) is of the nature of: Isin(2pi) + cos(2pi) -- which equals one (1). So, theoretically, e(4piI) is of the nature of: Isin(4pi) + cos(4pi) -- which equals one (1). Yet, a charge of e^(4piI) is Not necessarily ln(e^4piI) or ln(1) or 0. The directly prior assumption -- that e^(I*(a discrete integer-based variable)*pi), is to then always be 0 -- works to be true, if the directly corresponding scalar amplitude of such a case, is of a given scalar amplitude, that is pertinent to such a given charge that will then work to form a radial delineation, instead of a linear delineation. Yet, if the said correlative charge of such a case is, instead, of a linear respective delineation -- such a tense of the so-eluded-to Imaginary or Njenhuis charge, may then bear a discrete and actual genus, that is physically affectual upon its immediate environment.
That's all for now. To Be Continued! Sincerely, Sam Roach.
No comments:
Post a Comment