As To Relatively Njenhuis Activities Of The Kahler-Metric

Let us here consider one set of superstringular phenomenology -- that is undergoing the Kahler-Metric at one general locus, over a sequential series of correlative group-related instantons.  Let us consider this so-stated set of members of one tense of supestringular phenomenology, to be occurring in one covariant state of universal setting.  Let us now consider another set of superstringular phenomenology, that is, as well, undergoing the Kahler-Metric at another general locus, over a sequential series of correlative group-related instantons -- in a manner that is simultaneous to the activity of the here initially mentioned activity of the Kahler-Metric, via the vantage-point of a central conipoint.  Let us now consider this second so-stated set of members, of the second so-eluded-to tense of superstringular phenomenology -- to be occurring at another covariant state of universal setting.  Another words, one is here dealing with two different discrete sets of substringular phenomenology -- one of which is of one set of Hamiltonian-based eigenstates, that are of one universal setting, that is, at the so-eluded-to duration at question, going through the process of the Kahler-Metric --, while, the second of which, is a different set of Hamiltonian-based eigenstates of another universal setting, that is, at the so-eluded-to duration at question, going through the process of the Kahler-Metric.  This would then mean -- that one is dealing with two covariant sets of Hamiltonian operators, these of which may be here described of as appertaining to both -- one set of superstringular members of one universal setting, that are here working to re-attain the fractals of discrete energy that these need, in order to remain as discrete energy, this of which is kinematic -- in a covariant operational-based manner, to another set of superstringualr members that are of a different universal setting, that are, as well, working to re-attain the fractals of discrete energy that these need, in order to remain as discrete energy.   The first so-mentioned set of Hamiltonian-based operators of one universal setting -- that are here undergoing a tense of the Kahler-Meteric -- are a group of substringular members, that, although these are of a Real Reimmanian-base nature among the codifferentiable and the codeterminable kinematic activity that is amongst themselves, these same substringular members are here delineated in such a manner -- in so that these are of a Njenhuis-based geometrical distribution, when this is taken in a Li-based Gaussian genus of a mappable tracing, as is taken from the first so-stated group of Hamiltonian operators that are of one universal setting -- relative to the second mentioned set of superstringular members of Hamiltonian-based operation that are of a different universal setting, over time.  I will continue with the suspense later!  To Be Continued!  Sam Roach.