Let us initially consider two different Noether-Based mass-bearing cohesive sets of discrete energy quanta, that are here to be of basically the same general nature. Both of these two different inferred individually taken "teams" of discrete energy, are here to be exhibiting the mappable-tracing, of a "congruent" tense of a Lagrangian-Based path, as this is here to be taken into consideration, over the durational course of a relatively brief covariant Fourier-Transformation, that is here to work to bear the span of the same sequential series of group-related instantons. (As the inferred covariant duration that is to be considered here, in which these two different inferred "teams" of energy, are here to have had worked to map-out their correlative Lagrangian-Based paths, is to be indicated by a monomial tense, of an evenly-gauged relativistic Hamiltonian eigenmetric.) Next; The kinematic motion of one of these two said cohesive sets of discrete energy quanta, is here to work to mathematically bear a greater scalar amplitude of a Kahler-Based quotient, than the other indicated cohesive set of discrete energy quanta, as this is here to be taken, over the covariant span of time, in which these two earlier inferred sets of discrete energy quanta, have worked to map-out their "congruent" individually taken Lagrangian-Based traces. As a result; that cohesive set of discrete energy quanta of the two, that is here to have worked to mathematically bear a greater scalar amplitude of a Kahler-Based quotient, -- in the process of working to map-out its correlative Lagrangian-based path, -- will consequently tend to work to bear a higher relativistic intensity of a wave-tug, upon its immediately external environment, than that other cohesive set of discrete energy quanta of the two, that was instead, to mathematically bear a lower scalar amplitude of a Kahler-Based quotient. I will continue with the suspense later! To Be Continued! Sincerely, SAMUEL DAVID ROACH.
No comments:
Post a Comment