As To The Level Of Increment, Of Lorentz-Four-Contraction

 Initially: Please keep in mind, that Chern-Simons Invariants are only "invariant," when/if the motion of a cohesive set of discrete energy quanta, in any given arbitrary case scenario that is correlative to any set situation, is not to be changing at all, in its relationship to the motion of electromagnetic energy. The more that the gauged-action-related perturbation, that is here to be of a tense of the alteration of those correlative Chern-Simons Invariants, that are thence to be most appertaining to a tense of the fluctuation of the motion of a mass-bearing cohesive set of discrete energy quanta, is to work to display the general tendency, of a heightened scalar increment of a tense of a Lorentz-Four-Contraction, -- the more that there will be a higher probability, of a resultant consequential tendency of the proximal local presence, of the cohomology-related generation, of which will consequently tend to reverse-fractal, into the result, of an increase in the directly corresponding scalar amplitude, of the amount of magnetism, that such a stated cohesive set of discrete energy quanta, will thereby tend to be exhibiting. Consequently, as the corollary to the just mentioned idea; The less that the gauged-action-related perturbation, that is here to be of a tense of the alteration of those correlative Chern-Simons Invariants, that are thence to be most appertaining, to a tense of the fluctuation of the motion of a mass-bearing cohesive set of discrete energy quanta, is to work to display the general tendency, of a lowered scalar increment of a tense of a Lorentz-Four-Contraction, -- the more that there will be a higher probability, of a resultant consequential tendency of the proximal local presence, of the cohomology-related de-generation, of which will consequently tend to reverse-fractal, into the result, of a decrease in the directly corresponding scalar amplitude, of the amount of magnetism, that such a stated mass-bearing cohesive set of discrete energy quanta, will thereby tend to be exhibiting. Furthermore; when the i*PI(Del) Action is to work to bear a tendency, of a decrement of what I term of as being the phenomenology of "partition-based discrepancies," per each individually taken superstring of discrete energy permittivity, that is here to work to comprise its respective mass-bearing cohesive set of discrete energy quanta, this said general tendency, will tend to work to bear a kinematic activity, which will indirectly work to help at forming the homotopic product, of the gauged-action, of a discrete quantum of cohomology-related generation, with the gauged-action of a discrete quantum of group-related instanton. This results in a general tense of a reverse-fractal, that tends to work to form an increase in the scalar amplitude, of the proximal local magnetic field. Consequently; when the i*PI(Del) Action is to work to bear a tendency, of an increment of what I term of as being the phenomenology, of  "partition-based discrepancies," per each individually taken superstring of discrete energy permittivity, that is here to work to comprise its respective mass-bearing cohesive set of discrete energy quanta, this said general tendency, will tend to work to bear a kinematic activity, which will indirectly work to help at forming the homotopic product, of the gauged-action of a discrete quantum of a cohomology-related de-generation, with the gauged-action of a discrete quantum of group-related instanton. To Be Continued! Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.