Correlative Clifford Expansion And Orbifolds

Let us initially consider a relatively small set of adjacent orbifold eigensets -- of which are here to be, in part, comprised of discrete quanta of energy permittivity, that are to each (each combination of the individually taken superstrings and their immediately corresponding counterparts) work to bear their correlative Lorentz-Four-Contraction, as each of such individually taken combination of superstrings and their correlative counterstrings -- are to work to bear their correlative scalar amplitude of their directly corresponding Polyakov Action eigenstate -- as the so-stated adjacent orbifold eigensets of such a case scenario, are to bear the overall composition of those directly involved superstrings and counterstrings -- that are here to bear their hightened Clifford Expansion (as to the inverse of what their Lorentz-Four-Contractions would then bear) -- in accordance to their covariant velocity, when this is made in both a codeterminable and in a codifferentiable manner, relative to both the existence and the motion of electromagnetic energy.  Let us then say, that each of the individually taken superstrings of such a case -- may be said to be adjacent to each other -- when this is taken in an individually taken euclidean-based manner.  This would then mean, that the substringular situation of such a case -- is a given arbitrary example of a Minkowski-based flat-space region.  This would then, as well, mean that all of the said individually taken superstrings of such a case -- that are of the so-stated adjacent-based manner -- will then work to bear a euclidean tense of an orphoganal vibrational oscillation, when this is to be taken as any of the one of such individually taken superstrings of discrete energy permittivity, -- as to here be covariant in its explication upon any of the other of such so-stated given arbitrary individually taken superstrings of discrete energy permittivity, that are of this respective given arbitrary case scenario.  This would then, as well, -- mean, that the directoral-based topological sway of the sub-Fourier-based activity of the expanding Clifford-based interaction of the decompactifying superstring and its correlative decompactifying counterstring, -- is to bear a conformally invariant-based metric-gauge-based set of indices that are here to indicate the specific mannerisms of the inversely Lorentz-Four-Contracted individually taken superstrings -- that are here to be undergoing the Polyakov Action -- in so as to bear a well-suited set of Ward-Caucy-based conditions -- so that the overall angling of the directly corresponding superstrings that are to here be iterating as a set of moving discrete quanta of energy, that as well, work to bear a Majorana-Weyl-Invariant-Mode that is Poincare at the Noether-based region that is academic to the permutative Fourier-based field, by which the said orbifold eigensets are moving, yet not so much when this is taken into consideration amongst the other respective covariant superstrings of this said case -- is to still bear both the so-eluded-to codifferentiable and the so-eluded-to codeterminable genus of such a so-stated euclidean-based angling of the respective orphoganation, over the duration by which the so-eluded-to group-metric is to bear the so-eluded-to Fourier-differentiating Yukawa-based Noether field of such a respective given arbitrary case.
I will continue with the suspense later!  To Be Continued!  Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.