Thursday, March 5, 2015

As To Njenhuis Norm-State-Projections

Sometimes, there is a given arbitrary Calabi-Yau field -- that would here be represented by an orbifold eigenset, to where such as a particle, whose immediate field would thence work to form either an f-field or a d-field -- will work to bear a Gliossi-Sherk-Olive ghost, that is comprised of an integration of directly inter-related cohomological indices.  This is to where these so-stated ghost-based indices may here be occasionally scattered by norm-state-projections, that are not innately from our general universal setting.  For instance, one may often have a Calabi-Yau manifold that is comprised of an orbifold eigenset, that bears a lack of those norm-based conditions with certain other Calabi-Yau-based manifolds that are here relatively adjacenet to one another -- to where the two sets of Calabi-Yau-based manifolds discussed here will have a tense of bearing a different Gaussian-based format, by which the two said different sets of such physical mass-bearing manifolds will here be of two different universes.  Let us now say that there is a given arbitrary norm-state-projection -- that had here just guided the second so-eluded-to set of Calabi-Yau manifolds, in such a manner to where the group attractor matrix that I have just eluded-to here, as helping to work at adjusting the said second mentioned set of Calabi-Yau manifolds, is pulled into the immediate either f-field or d-field of the first mentioned Calabi-Yau manifold. (The so-eluded-to initial set of mass-bearing manifold, of which is here, in this respective given arbitrary case, a single of such manifolds.)  The norm-state-projection that is not of a Real Reimmanian-based inter-relationship to the initially mentioned Calabi-Yau manifold, will then bear a Gliossi-based interaction upon the initial mass-bearing manifold (Calabi-Yau manifold), to where the Gliossi-Sherk-Olive ghost-based pattern that had then been initially formed by the so-eluded-to particle of mass that I had started talking about here, will have its integration of cohomological-based indices annharmonically scattered to one extent or another.  This is to where there will be a certain degree of a Rayleigh scattering, of the initial ordering that had been formed by the prior-based Reimman scattering -- the latter of which had worked here to form the so-stated ghost-based pattern, that had come together in so as to form the physical memory of both the existence and the activity of that respective given arbitrary particle -- whose projected trajectory had formed a mappable tracing that left a trace of as to the where, how, and when, the said mass-bearing particle  whose ghost-based indices had been scattered, had been. This genus of a Rayleigh scattering will not necessarily form as viable of an effect upon the said starting particle itself, as it would have had upon its mappable tracing, yet, either way, there would then be at least some sort of a direct relationship between the indices that would here be directly affiliated with one Gaussian-based setting of one universe -- to the other Gaussian-based setting of what would here be another of such universes, in this given arbitrary case scenario.  I will continue with the suspense later!
To Be Continued!!! Sincerely, Sam Roach.

No comments: