Part Four of the First Session of Course 17, the Ricci Scalar

The holonomic substrate of the second-ordered light-cone-gauge eigenstates of a one-dimensional superstring bear 120 mini-string segments that work to form a chord of core-field-density -- that is bundled together in a linear-based manner, that is compactified to the extent that these are relatively de-compactified from a tense of mamimum compactification by a factor of two.  On a similar note, the holonomic substrate of the second-ordered light-cone-gauge eigenstates of a two-dimensional superstring bear 60 mini-string segments that work to form a chord of core-field-density -- that is bundled together in a linear-based manner, that is compactified to the extent that these are relatively de-compactified from a tense of maximum compactification by a factor of two.  This way, each second-ordered light-cone-gauge eigenstate of any given arbitrary one-dimensional superstring -- of discrete energy permittivity -- bears a condition of having 120 gauge-bosons -- that work to pluck each of these said second-ordered eigenstates like a harp over each succeeding iteration of BRST, in which the so-eluded-to stringular topological stratum is of the said dimensionality of one..  Likewise, each second-ordered light-cone-gauge eigenstate of any given arbitrary two-dimensional superstring of discrete energy permittivity bears a condition of having 60 gauge-bosons -- that work to pluck each of these said second-ordered eigenstates like a harp over each succeeding iteration of BRST, in which the so-eluded-to stringular topological strutum is of the said dimensionality of two.  The so-stated condition of the chord-like phenomenology of each given arbitrary second-ordered light-cone-gauge eigenstate (5 of such chords for one-dimensional superstrings, and 10 of such chords for two-dimensional superstrings of discrete energy permittivity), being de-compactified from maximum compactification by a factor of two, works to allow for the condition to where the "plucking" of these so-stated chords may be able to happen without any fraying of homotopic-based invariance.  This general format that I have just discussed is true for light-cone-gauge topological-based chords that are either of a Kaluza-Klein-based abelian topology, and also for light-cone-gauge topological-based chords that are of a Yang-Mills-based non-abelian topology.  The main difference, being here, that an abelian light-cone-gauge topology is plucked at the extrapolatable even-based distributions -- in a symmetrical-based delineation, that is along the contour of the relatively supplemental contour of each so-eluded-to second-ordered light-cone-gauge eigenstates, whereas, a non-abelian light-cone-gauge topology is plucked at the loci where the so-eluded-to chord-based phenomena is perturbated, distribution wise, into its Laplacian-based sinusoidal-based cusps (that is as well in a symmetrical-based delineation).  This added description is, as an ansantz, true for both the core-field density of light-cone-gauge eigenstates of either one-dimensional strings of discrete energy permittivity -- as well as for the core-field-density of those light-cone-gauge eigenstates of two-dimensional strings of discrete energy permittivity.  The core-field-density of first-ordered light-cone-gauge eigenstates act as the counterpart of the correlative respective Fadeev-Popov-Trace eigenstates.
I will start the second session of Course 17 later!  To Be Continued!  Sincerely, Samuel Roach.