Part Four of the Eigth Session of Course Nine

The added dimensionality of two-dimensional superstrings causes them to have not only two-dimensional discrepencies, yet also to have three-dimensional discrepencies.  So, one-dimensional superstrings have discrepencies that exist on the relative reverse-norm-to-norm-to-holomorphic side of the Laplacian settings that these exist in at their topological center.  (This center being closer to the relative norm-to-holomorphic Laplacian end of each individual superstring that is to be considered.)  Two-Dimensional superstrings have discrepencies that are both to the relative holomorphic side of the general topology of the mentioned superstrings per each Laplacian setting at the relative 90 degree mark, while these described discrepencies per each Laplacian setting are simultaneously placed in the relative norm-to-holomorphic position at the relative 90 degree mark of the same arbitrary two-dimensional superstring.  At the relative 270 degree mark of any given two-dimensional superstring, the discrepency from the hermitian Laplacian topological flow of the mentioned superstring exists in the reverse-holomorphic position, while the described discrepency per each Laplacian setting are    simultaneously placed in the relative norm-to-reverse-holomorphic position.
Again, one-dimensional superstrings that act as discrete units of energy permittivity bear one discrepency, while two-dimensional superstrings that act as discrete units of energy permittivity bear two discrepencies.
What I mean by discrepencies are seperations from the Laplacian hermitian topological flow of the delineation of the first-ordered point particles that comprise one and two-dimensional superstrings.
Substringular field in the form of mini-string still interconnects the described discrepencies with the rest of the  correlative superstrings during each Laplacian setting that form the basis of the conformal dimension of each superstring that exists in some sort of hermtian topological delineation during each  BRST duration that comprises the majority of the duration of each instanton that happens in the course of substringular iteration.  The added entropy that happens to the mentioned two-dimensional superstrings causes these to form more dilatons when these mentioned superstrings are propagated through space.  This configuration of discrepencies (partitions) causes these to "flap" a little bit more than one-dimensional supestrings when these are propagated through space.  The faster the mentioned two-dimensional superstrings travel transversally per iteration at under light-speed when the light-cone-gauge topology of the described two-dimensional superstrings is Kaluza-Klein,  (Kaluza-Klein meaning to bear an abelian light-cone-gauge topology.) the more that the associated two-dimensional superstrings tend to "flap."  As the Planck-Related phenomena that are associated with two-dimensional superstrings that are of a Kaluza-Klein light-cone-gauge topology flap, the corresponding two-dimensional superstrings flap in synchronicity with the prior mentioned Planck-Related phenomena.  Yet, Yang-Mills bosonic superstrings are often electromagnetic in nature, which causes these to travel at light-speed when in a vacuum, which decreases the inefficiency of the prior mentioned "flapping."  This is because the added wave holonomic condition that exists here provides a homostasis that tends to support the holonomic stability of the superstrings here due to an increase in the fractal modulae of the said superstring on account of the mentioned physical counterbalances that thus happen here.  One-Dimensional superstrings tend to orbit back-and-forth upon their axes as these are propagated through space.  I will continue with the last part of this session later.  Until then, God Bless You in the name of Yahweh, and I hope for only positive things for all of the readers who read my blog posts.               
Sincerely,
Sam Roach.