Saturday, October 23, 2010

Solutions To Last Test Of Course 5

 Hello there World,  this is Sam Roach here!  Here are the solutions to yesterday's test.

1)  The bringing together of mini-string to allow for the tight regions of substringular fields that form the first-ordered point particles of superstrings is a substringular example o a compactification that involves Yakawa Couplngs.  This is because the exterial Gliossi touch of mini-string activity here causes such a condition of compactification.

2)  Humans touching life forms, people holding onto a writing utensil, and people rubbing their foot on the floor are reverse fractored metaphorical examples of "Yakawa Couplings."

3)  Trash being smushed in a trash compactor is a good example of compactification.  The elimination of the spaces in-between the stough here that is smushed, to where the overall said stough takes up less space, is the process of an arbitrary example of compactification.

4)  Waves may become color indirectly via Imaginary Tangency.  Imaginary Tangency is touch that involves four or more dimensions that thus involves freedom of motion that utilizes 4piI degrees of freedom of motion or more in terms of the process of certain subatomic touch, rub, and curl.

5)  Light "catches" strings via the inter-relation of the Bases of Light with their corresponding superstrings during the sub-metric that comes right before instanton-quaternionic-field-impulse-mode.

6)  Right after homotopy begins to almost break at the end of what I call the "space-hole", the substringular encoder potentials of each tori-sector-range "mold" to form the holomorphic entity of one substringular encoder that exists during the Laplacian Condition of one instanton to allow for the relationship of superstrings with their corresponding mini-bases during instanton.  The metric in which mini-bases and their related superstrings spread to their proper delineations forms the said ripples, which may be described via the mapping of the fifteen categories of ghost anomalies that arbitrarily exist per instanton.
                          
I hope that you did well!  What makes a correct solution may vary, in so long as the concepts are right.
Sincerely,
Sam.

No comments: