Tuesday, September 29, 2020

My Perception, As To A Particular Case Of A Metaphorical Radial Propagation Of Solitons

 Let us initially consider two different propagating intersecting fields. One of such fields, is appertaining to a given arbitrary radial propagation of thought waves.  The other of such fields, is here to be appertaining to a given arbitrary radial propagation of gravitational waves. Let us next say, that these just two implied radial fields, are here to propagate in such a manner, to where the ulterior field in both comparative cases, is to work to bear neither any overt net wave cancellation nor any overt net wave reinforcement, -- from the other of the two said radial propagating fields. One may potentially view this, as a metaphorical orthogonal intersection of two propagating solitons, -- in which, when perceived from both the individually taken "perspective" of the field of the propagating thought waves, as well as when perceived from the individually taken "perspective" of the field of the propagating gravitational waves, that the ulterior covariant field in either way you "look" at it, is here to work to bear neither any cancellation of nodal eigenstates, Nor any reinforcement of nodal eigenstates, from the other of the two respective radial propagated fields. Yet; if one were somehow to be able to polarize, such an inferred intersecting gauged action-related Yukawa Coupling of wave-related field construct, Then, there would consequently tend to be a significantly greater chance of having these two fields, to work to either attenuate and/or to amplify, the wave-related characteristics, of such an initially taken radial propagation of an orthogonal dual-state, that was here to be of an intersecting set of thought wave/gravitational wave related eigenstates, that were here to be kinematically drawn outward, as a tense of a set of quantized Schwinger-like indices, as this is hereby to bear a mappable-tracing, as taken along the directly associated proximal local region of the Rarita Structure. Sam Roach.

No comments: