Here's an example -- as to how a phenomenology may be superconformally invariant at an internal reference-frame, even though it may be kinetic in motion at an external reference-frame.:
A tree that is rooted in the ground tends to be relatively stationary at an internal reference-frame, from an observing person on earth. Yet, since the earth is constantly moving around the sun in outer space -- at the vantage point of our planet earth, the tree is then to be consequently moving at a relatively more significant manner at an external reference-frame.
Likewise, -- mass-bearing superstrings of discrete energy permittivity, are superconformally invariant at an internal reference-frame, -- even though such said mass-bearing superstrings of discrete energy permittivity, are here to be kinetic at an external reference-frame.
It is the open strings that are of discrete kinetic energy permittivity, that are here to work to move those particular closed strings -- that are here of discrete mass-bearing energy permittivity.
I will continue with the suspense later! To Be Continued! Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.
No comments:
Post a Comment