Relativistic Oscillation-Based Tendencies

Let us initially consider one given arbitrary mass-bearing orbifold eigenset -- that is of one specific general genus of superstringular field.  It is to have an oscillation-based tendency -- that is here to work to help at fortifying the core field of the said orbifold eigenset -- that may here be described of as being an "E(8)XE(8)" heterotic string.  Let us next stipulate, that there are here, in this respective given case, to be the presence of three orbifold eigensets to be considered here in this particular case, that are here to be of the same general genus of a superstringular field -- in so as to each be covariant in delineation, in the same general tense of holomorphicity, -- in such a manner, to where all three of the so-eluded-to orbifold eigensets, are here to be of the same universal setting.  Let us next specifically consider the central of the three orbifold eigensets, to be delineated at a Laplacian-based positioning, that is just to the forward-holomorphic side of another one of these three orbifold eigensets.  The pertinent oscillation-based tendency of the orbifold eigenset that is here to be in the center of the three so-stated orbifold eigensets, will then tend to work to bear a relativistic oscilation-based tendency -- that is of the nature of bearing a scalar amplitude of
(i*(E(8)XE(8)), when this is here to be taken in covariance with the orbifold eigenset, that is here to be delineated at a relative positioning, that is just to the reverse-holomorphic side of the said "central" positioning, when this is here to be taken along the so-implyed holomorphic field.;  Whereas,
the pertinent oscillation-based tendency of the orbifold eigenset, that is here to be delineated in the center of the three so-stated orbifold eigensets, will then  tend to work to bear a relativistic oscillation-based tendency -- that is of the nature of bearing a scalar amplitude of (-i*(E(8)XE(8))), when this is here to be taken in covariance with the orbifold eigenset, that is here to be delineated at a relative positioning, that is just to the forward-holomorphic side of the said "central" positioning, when this is here to be taken along the so-implyed holomoprhic field.  Furthermore -- if one were to, instead, to consider what the respective pertinent oscillaltion-based tendency would be, -- of an orbifold, that is of the same general genus of a field, that is here to be delineated in a holomorphic manner, that is to be placed at two orbifold eigensets ahead of an initially considered orbifold eigenset of that field, -- the said covariant pertinent oscillation-based tendency of this said eigenset that is to be placed in a Laplacian-based manner at the said locus -- that is here to be at two relative placements ahead of the initially said one, would then work to bear a scalar amplitude of (-i*(E(8)XE(8))), when this is here to be taken in covariance with the initally stated orbifold eigenset. This is the tendency of such a general pattern.  I will conitnue with the suspense later!  To Be Continued!  Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.