Substringular Ward-Cauchy-related phenomenology that actually does "stuff," may be thought of as being -- in one manner or another -- examples of Hamiltonian operators. Whereas, -- the actual superstringular motion of discrete quanta of energy over time, may be thought of as being -- in one manner or another -- examples appertaining to being of a Lagrangian. Consequently, -- the holonomic substrate of superstringular phenomenology -- that is to perform a specific function in the substringular, may here to be considered as the general essence as to what a Hamiltonian operator is, whereas, the actual motion of such a just mentioned holonomic substrate of superstringular phenomenology, may here to be considered as the general essence as to what a Lagrangian is.
I will continue with the suspense later! To Be Continued! Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.
No comments:
Post a Comment