Let us initially say that one is here to have a soliton, that is here to be mapping-out a Lagrangian-based path, that is here to work to bear a cohomological mappable-tracing, that is here to be of a set of spaces, that are, in this case, to be considered to be of a relatively Gaussian-related nature -- to an observer of whom is to be extrapolating such a Ward-Cauchy-related situation, over a proscribed evenly-gauged Hamiltonian eigenmetric, over the so-eluded-to duration of time. Let us next say, that such a so-eluded-to just mapped-out set of Gaussian-related cohomological eigenindices, are to initially to work to form a De Rham cohomology, when at a level that is Reimman to the said soliton at the Poincare level, -- of which would thereby tend to be of a relatively hermitian nature. Let us next say that there is to ensue a certain Cevita interaction, that were then to spontaneously work to become Yukawa to the initially stated soliton, -- to where there is here to be a set of metrical-based Chern-Simons spurs, that are now to be attributed to the cohomological field, that is here to be directly associated with that manifold that was here initially to be a soliton. At this point, the soliton is no longer to be a soliton, -- since the initially stated phenomenology -- is then to go from working to bear a delineation that distributes a holomorphic vector field, INTO, instead, to becoming a phenomenology that is here to work to bear a delineation that distributes a tensoric field, that may or may not be of a specific holomorphic tendency of motion. Furthermore, any Ward-Cauchy-related phenomenon that is to become of a Doubolt cohomology, by working to bear a set of one or more metrical-related Chern-Simons spurs -- that may be attributed to it over any duration that may be heuristically extrapolated as such over time, -- is to not to tend to be distributing a holmorophic vector field, and is, in such a case, to tend to not be of the nature of being a soliton.
I will continue with the suspense later! To Be Continued! Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.
No comments:
Post a Comment