So -- what about the "i*PI(del) Action?" The "i*PI" discussed here, has to to do with the condition, that there is here to be a Laplacian-based back-and-forth toggling of partition-based discrepancies -- that are delineated from the relative holomorphic positioning(s) at the first placement of such partition-based discrepancies, to the relative reverse-holomorphic positioning(s) at the next placement of such discrepancies, and so-on. This is taken the other way around, for the respective directly corresponding counter string. (From relative reverse-holomorphic positioning(s) to relative holomorphic positioning(s).) Such general tendencies are then to happen, until all of the delineations of those partition-based discrepancies may then be accounted for -- along the topological curvature of the general superstring and its counterstring. By far, most superstrings are bosonic. Let's say that we were to call the relative forward motion of a superstring to be the relative forward-holomorphic direction. If 0 PI is here to be an "origin" at the centrally Nijenhuis-to-reverse-holomorphic side of the topology of a superstring -- if one were to trace around the said circle, in both a holomorphic and in a reverse-holomorphic manner at the same time, one would then end-up at the relative positioning of PI. The "i" has to do with the earlier mentioned back-and-forth Laplacian-based toggling, that is of the said respective partition-based discrepancies. The just mentioned discrepancies are a relative-motion-related phenomenology of holonomic spur, as taken along the topological delineation of the general Laplacian-related vibrational curvature, that is of the central core-field-density of the cohomological mappable-tracing -- that is of the GSO-based coniaxial of any one given arbitrary superstring of discrete energy permittivity during BRST. The exchange of such partition-based discrepancies is the condition of homotopic residue. The kinetic action of homotopic residue is thence the "i*PI(del) Action."
I will continue with the suspense later! To Be Continued! Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.
No comments:
Post a Comment