Tuesday, May 10, 2016

Splitting Of Cohomological Mappable Tracing

Let us initially consider one given arbitrary cohomology, that acts as the ghost-based pattern that is to here be formed by one relatively large orbifold eigenset -- that is moving through a Rham cohomology, that is moving in a Fourier-based manner through a hermitian Lagrangian, over time.  Let us now say that, at a given instant, the just said orbifold eigenset is to form a metrical-based Chern- Simons singularity, that works here in so as to help to cause the initially said orbifold eigenset to convert into two separate smaller orbifold eigensets.  Let us next say that one of the two said smaller orbifold eigensets that had just formed at this point in the so-eluded-to group metric, is to be pulled into a Doubolt cohomology -- via a thus just formed Lagrangian-based Chern-Simons singularity that will have just formed, simultaneously, during the so-stated metrical-based Chern-Simons singularity, via the vantage-point of a central conipoint.  As this is happening, the other of the two said smaller orbifold eigensets that had just formed at this point in the so-eluded-to group metric, is to be pulled into a continuation of the initially so-stated Rham-based cohomology, via a hermitian Lagrangian that is to be pulling through a different course of a Hamiltonian operand than the other so-stated relatively small orbifold eigenset -- that is to be pulled, instead, here, into the so-stated Lagrangian-based Chern-Simons singularity, over time.  Next, let us consider that -- at the opposite end of the overall said cohomological stratum -- from where the said ghost-based pattern is to be generated, the cohomological entity is to soon start to be degenerated.  If the Hamiltonian operation of the said degenerative process, that is to here be directly associated with the Rayleigh scattering of the said ghost-based pattern -- is to bear exclusively complex roots in the eigenbasis of its intrinsic functional grouping, then, the directly corresponding degeneration of the given arbitrary cohomology will then tend to bear only bear a Njenhuis topological sway -- thus causing only the just formed Doubolt-based cohomological spur that had just formed, to be degenerated in the process of the correlative Rayleigh-based scattering that is to here be underway, yet, if the Hamiltonian operation of the said degenerative process, that is to here be directly associated with the Rayleigh scattering of the said ghost-based pattern -- is to bear exclusively Real-based roots in the eigenbasis of its intrinsic functional grouping, then, the directly corresponding degeneration of the given arbitrary cohomology, will then tend to bear only a Real-based topological sway -- thus causing only the correlative Rham-based cohomology, that is to here be underway via the directoral pull of the hermitian-based direction of singularity -- to be directly associated with the Rayleigh scattering of the said ghost-based pattern that is to then work to eliminate that said part of the cohomological-based mappable tracing.
I will continue with the suspense later!  To Be Continued!  Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.

No comments: