As To Majorana-Weyl-Invariant-Modes

In general -- the tighter that any given arbitrary respective Noether-based orbifold eigenset --  that is to bear a specific given arbitrary respective Majorana-Weyl-Invariant-Mode, happens to be of,  then, the less likely that the directly corresponding proximal locus of the respective internal reference frame, that is of such a case scenario, is to be going any closer to light speed, than if the said respective Noether-based orbifold eigenset is to, instead, work to bear a less tightly-knit Majorana-Weyl-Invariant-Mode, at the Poincare level that is correlative to the so-stated internal proximal local substringular reference frame, that is of such a case scenario.  For instance -- if one is to have a given arbitrary orbifold eigenset of one unique and specific internal reference frame, that is to bear a relatively highly knit MajoranayWeyl-Invarint-Mode in the substringular, then, the proximal locus of the here so-eluded-to tense of conformal invariance -- will here tend to be in a relatively high scalar amplitude of acting from within a tightly-knit limited Ward-Caucy-based region, and, thereby, its velocity will then tend to be far removed from any viable tense of activity, that would otherwise even compare to that general motion that may be associated with light speed.  Yet, if such a respective orbifold eigenset is to, instead, bear a very loosely-knit tense of Majoranay-Weyl-Invarince, then, the eigenmembers of the Hamiltonian-based operation -- that would here function in so as to work to extrapolate the propagational-based Fourier-affiliated kinematic activity of the said orbifold eigenset that is of such a case, is  to much more likely move in one tense or another, significantly closer in its propagation to a genus that is less further removed from light speed, over the general genus of the sequential series of instantons -- by which the Fourier-based activity of such a respective given arbitrary orbifold eigenset is to differentiate in so as to act as a metrical-gauge-based Hamiltonian operator.
I will continue with the suspense later!  To Be Continued! Sincereley, Samuel David Roach.