The Kahler-Metric and Conformal Invariance

Let us say that one is to have a set of superstrings, that are to here be differentiating in a Fourier-based manner, as an orbifold eigenset that is of a Noether-based flow -- over a relatively transient sequential series of iterations of group-related instanton.  Let us next consider that the so-stated Noether Flow of the superstrings that are here appertaining to one discrete orbifold eigenset, are here to be undergoing the Kahler-Metric -- at a proximal localization that is of a relatively conformally invariant Majorana-Weyl-Invariant-Mode.  During the sequential series of instantons in which the directly corresponding set of superstrings that work to form an orbifold eigenset, is of a nature to where the so-eluded-to given arbitrary individually taken superstrings that work to comprise the said orbifold eigenset, during each individually taken iteration of BRST -- work to bear an orientable tense of their holonomic substrate -- by operating in so that the directly corresponding field that is to here exist in-between each of such said superstrings and their counterstrings, is to then be of a homeomorphic topological genus, over the course of each individually taken Bette (Beti) Action eigenstate in which the so-eluded-to superstrings of discrete energy permittivity are to then be in a condition of Noether Flow, as the so-stated set of superstrings that operate in so as to perform one specific function are to here be undergoing a tense of conformal invariance in their directly associated Majorana-Weyl-Invariant-Mode.  Let us next say, that right after the so-stated directly corresponding Kahler-Metric is completed -- for the directly associated respective given arbitrary superstrings that have here just completed the task of re-attaining those fractals of discrete energy permittivity that these needed to re-attain, in order for the correlative discrete energy quanta -- that have here worked to comprise the Ward-Caucy-based condition of being those respective superstrings of discrete energy permittivity that have here come together in so as to form the correlative orbifold eigenset -- happens, to where the so-stated superstrings that have here worked to comprise the so-stated orbifold eigenset, are to here begin to lack a homeomorphic field in-between each of such directly corresponding superstrings and their directly corresponding counterstrings.  This will then work to cause the said respective superstrings of such a case, to then not be orientable during the directly corresponding individually taken increments of BRST, in which each of such individually taken superstrings that had then been iterating from within this, had been differentiating in a Fourier-based tense.  Let us next say that these directly corresponding superstrings that are of the said respective given arbitrary orbifold eigenstate of this case, are then to not be orientable in the individually taken ensuing iterations of the Regge Action, as well.  This will then cause these said superstrings -- that have here worked to comprise the said orbifold eigenset of this case -- to not be of an orientable nature.  Superstrings that are neither orientable during both the correlative Bette (Beti) Action, and the correlative ensuing Regge Action, as well -- will then become of a tachyonic-based flow.  This will then mean -- in this case -- that the superstrings that had here worked to form the said orbifold eigenset will then become of such a Fourier-based manner -- in so as to then become of such a manner that is not to here be of a Noether-based flow.  This is due to the condition, that such a lack of orientation in the tense of a superstring -- will temporarily convert the light-cone-gauge topology of the directly corresponding superstrings to go from being of a Kaluza-Klein-based nature into being of  a Yang-Mills-based nature.  I will continue with the suspense later!  To Be Continued!  Sincerely,Samuel David Roach.