As To Physical Re-Delineation Of Masses

Let us consider a set of discrete masses.  Let us say that the masses that are to be considered here, are in a relationship that is to then involve the initial Laplacian-based condition of three basic hydrogen atoms.  In this given arbitrary case scenario, one is to here be considering the fundamental sub-atomic particles that are to then work to comprise the three so-stated basic respective hydrogen atoms -- that I have eluded-to in this given arbitrary case.  What I am more specifically referring to as the physical substrate of each of such individually taken discrete masses -- of which are to be considered here as the eigenmembers of this respective given arbitrary case scenario, are the two fundamental basic cases of what always exist in any stable atom, by which I am simply referring to as the initial Laplacian-based condition of the existence of one relatively stable proton, that is being surrounded by the kinematic-based orbiting of one relatively stable electron, -- that are of the nature of as to being of either the holonomic substrate of a proton, or of the nature of being of the holonomic substrate of an electron.  Let us say that all three of such mentioned fundamental hydrogen atoms (each of which are a stable atom that is comprised of one proton that is being orbited by one electron), are to then each become positively charged all of the sudden -- by losing their respective multiplicit electron -- due to a proximal localized group-attractor.  The then resulting three loose protons would then tend to move towards whatever loose negatively charged adjacent source, is most aptly to be able to bring this so-eluded-to loose set of three positive charges into a state of optimum rest.  In the course of such a basic situation -- one is to then have a re-adjustment of the local delineation of the distribution of the proximal gluonic force of this specific case scenario -- since the three directly corresponding protons of such a basic case that I have described here, are made unstable, in order to move into a changed delineation, in so as to move into the respective individually taken spots where these are then to be at more of a state of optimum rest.  Individual protons each consist of two quarks that bind to one lepton.  Any given quark has a gluon that is situated within the Ward-Neumman bounds of its topological-based holonomic substrate.  Gluons -- of which are an example of what works to act as being a metrical-gauge-based Hamiltonian operator of the strong force -- are an example of a general condition as to the cite as to where there is a centralized knotting of the Rarita Structure.  (Where there is a gluon, there is an eigenstate of the centralized knotting of the Rarita Structure.)  So, whenever a proton is re-distributed in so as to form a re-delineation of its component gluons that are directly associated with the here so-eluded-to  Ward-Caucy bounds of the so-stated respective proton -- there is then to be a re-delineation of an eigenstate of the strong force.  So, whenever there is a re-delineation of the strong force -- there is thereby a directly corresponding re-delineation of an eigenstate of the centralized knotting of the respective multiplicit Rarita Structure eigenstate.  I will continue with the suspense later!  To Be Continued!
Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.