A Little Bit As To Substringular Harmonics

The harmonics mode of the vibrational oscillation of a superstring -- during the generally noticed duration of instanton -- is related to the format of its spin. For example, if a superstring bears a harmonic mode during BRST, then, the said superstring will be said to have a whole spin. Yet, if a superstring bears an anharmonic mode during BRST, then, the said superstring will be said to have a fractional spin. Bosonic superstrings are closed strings. Closed superstrings that are not heterotic, are two-dimensional superstrings. Fermionic superstrings are open strings. Open strings are one-dimensional superstrings. Fermionic superstrinigs bear an anharmonic mode of vibrational oscillation, when in terms of the pulse of their spin-orbital indices during BRST. Fermionic strings are said to have a fractional spin. Bosonic superstrings bear a harmonic mode of vibrational oscillation, when in terms of the pulse of their spin-orbital indices during BRST. Bosonic strings are said to have a whole spin. During the generally unnoticed duration of Ultimon Flow, fermionic superstrings bear a harmonic mode of vibrational oscillation, when in terms of the pulse of their spin-orbital indices over the period of the said general format of duration mentioned here in this sentence. Also, during the generally unnoticed duration of Ultimon Flow, bosonic strings bear an anharmonic mode of vibrational oscillation, when in terms of the pulse of their spin-orbital indices. Superstrings, though, have more to do with the angular momentum of discrete energy, while, their directly corresponding Fadeev-Popov-Trace eigenstates have more to do with the spin-orbital momentum of discrete energy. Superstrings are discrete quanta of energy permittivity, while Fadeev-Popov-Trace eigenstates are discrete quanta of energy impedance.  Yet, to some extent, every physical phenomenon bears at least some sort of angular momentum, and every physical phenomenon bears at least some sort of spin-orbital momentum. Both superstrings and Fadeev-Popov-Trace eigenstates have more to do with the pointal-based nature of discrete energy than of the wave-based nature of discrete energy.  However -- the directly corresponding counterstrings of discrete energy have more to do with the wave-functionability of energy permittivity, while the directly corresponding first-ordered light-cone-gauge eigenstates, when taken individually, have more to do with the wave-functionability of discrete energy impedance.  The drive of a phenomenon through a directoral-based Lagrangian, is the general operation of a tense of angular momentum. The shaking-like wave-tug/wave-pull of a phenomenon through a directoral-based Lagrangian -- is the general operation of a tense of spin-orbital momentum. The angular momentum of superstrings, and, the spin-orbital momentum of Fadeev-Popov-Traces -- works to relate the basis as to how the various spaces and sub-spaces of the substringular inter-relate, while, the spin-orbital momentum of superstrings and the angular momentum of Fadeev-Popov-Traces -- works to relate the basis as to the covariant-based parity that exists among the various spaces and subspaces in the substringular. Again, superstrings are discrete units of energy permittivity, while, Fadeev-Popov-Traces are discrete units of energy impedance. Hold onto your hats, and, I will continue with the suspense later! Sam Roach.