Some More As To The Fractal Of The Kahler-Metric

Here is some additional information, as to the manner in which the wobble-like tendencies of discrete quanta of energy -- as such wobbling happens during each succeeding iteration of group-related instanton -- happens in some ways, to kind of act like a fractal of the kinematic-based activity of the Kahler-Metric.  When any respective given arbitrary Fadeev-Popov-Trace eigenstate wobbles, in so as to work at bearing a topological sway -- over the course of any correlative iteration of BRST (during the main part of any respective given arbitrary iteration of instanton) -- such a so-eluded-to discrete quanta of energy impedance (specifically here, the particle-based physical holonomic substrate, that acts as a discrete physical unit of energy impedance) will tend to bear a covariant, codeterminable, and a codifferentiable back-and-forth angling motion, that will bear a subtension, that is of the relative scalar amplitude of 1.104735878*10^(-81)I degrees -- relative to all of the other adjacent Fadeev-Popov-Trace eigenstates that are encoded as being of the exact same universe, during the simultaneous iteration of group-related instanton, of any respective given arbitrary case scenario.  However, depending upon what other universal setting that other adjacent Fadeev-Popov-Trace eigenstates of a respective case belong to -- such an angling will vary -- as an interdependent condition, that is involved with both the manner and the degree that the two different individually taken Fadeev-Popov-Trace eigenstates are encoded as being -- of a specific scalar amplitude of divergence from being of the same universal setting.  So, if two spaces are of the same universe -- then, these will be of a Gaussian-based nature, the one towards the other, over the course of one specifically entailed iteration of group-related instanton, in which the two said given spaces are here being compared of as such.  Yet, if two spaces are not of the same universe -- then, these will only be able to be compared to one another through a Gaussian-based Transform -- via the involvement of certain Njenhuis-based mathematics, or, in other words, via a tense of a manner of Li Algebra.  Thereby, if two respective Fadeev-Popov-Trace eigenstates are not of the same universe -- then, the correlative covariant-based wobbling, that these so-eluded-to discrete quanta of energy impedance will work to bear- - will then involve a different topological sway of wobbling, relative to one another, depending upon both the manner and the scalar amplitude of the differences that these discrete quanta of holonomic substrate would here work to bear -- over each individually taken iteration of group-related instanton, in which the different said individual quanta of discrete energy impedance -- that are here of different universal settings -- are here to remain in the same relative general tense of codifferentiability.  Furthermore and specifically (more in terms of discrete energy impedance than with discrete energy permittivity) -- the covariant topological sway as to the wobbling of one genus of a Fadeev-Popov-Trace eigenstate towards another of such a genus of Fadeev-Popov-Trace eigenstate -- works to define the general format as to the differences in Li Algebra-based indices of the discrete energy impedance -- of the one discrete quanta of related energy towards the other discrete quanta of related energy -- during any respective given arbitrary iteration of group-related instanton, in which any given arbitrary comparison that is taken between two of such particle-based discrete quanta of energy are being compared in the substringular.  This may act as a fractal as to the condition in which the Kahler-Metric tends to bear those correlative Klein Bottle eigenstates -- that, unless perturbated -- tend to work only upon discrete quanta of energy, that are of the same universal setting.  To Be Continued!  Sincerely, Sam Roach.