Friday, November 27, 2015
As To Colliding Cohomologies
Let's say that there was a certain Reimman scattering of norm-state-projections -- which resulted in an integration of ghost-based indices, in so as to work at forming a cohomological-based setting. Let us say that the so-inferred cohomology, was formed by the interaction of a set of mass-bearing superstrings that interacted with a set of inter-bound point commutators. Let us now imagine that the so-eluded-to cohomological-based topological entity that I am here describing, were to have a Laplacian-based edge -- that would here work at bearing a set of abelian-like geometrical-based characteristics. Let us now imagine -- at the relatively reverse-holomorphic side to where the said initially stated cohomology was formed -- that one is here to have another cohomological-based setting, of which is well will here be formed by mass-bearing superstrings. This second so-mentioned integration of ghost-based indices will, instead though, bear a set of non-abelian geometric-based indices, that will make the just briefly described part of an edge of the second so-eluded-to cohomological-based entity to have a set of non-abelian-like geometric-based characteristics. Let us now say that there is both a respective ghost-based inhibitor working to displace the Laplacian-based state of the first so-stated cohomology, as well as a respective ghost-based inhibitor working to displace the Laplacian-based state of the second so-stated cohomology. Let us say that the said ghost-based inhibitor that works to perturbate in so as to move the first so-stated cohomology -- is positioned at the relative holomorphic side of the first said cohomology, while the said ghost-based inhibitor that works to perturbate in so as to move the second so-stated cohomology -- is positioned at the relative reverse-holomorphic side of the second said cohomology. Let us say that the resultant motion of the so-stated displaced integration of ghost-based entities, works here to form a collision of what would otherwise be two proximal mappable tracings of the physical memory of two different sets of superstrings of discrete energy permittivity. Let us now say that the earlier mentioned abelian edge of the first so-staetd cohomology is to hit the earlier mentioned non-abelian edge of the second so-stated cohomology. Let us say that all of the other factors would otherwise work to form a theoretical resultant end to the said displacement of the two said cohomological settings, over time. The Hamiltonian operation of the cohomology that had the said abelian-like edge, would then tend to bear a scalar amplitude of wave-tug/wave-pull -- that would tend to move the overall interaction of the two so-eluded-to cohomological entities, in the direction in which the first so-stated cohomology was going. I will continue with the suspense later! To Be Continued! Sincerely, Sam Roach.
Posted by
samsphysicsworld
at
7:16 AM
Labels:
abelian edge,
cohomology,
Hamiltonian,
Laplacian,
non-abelian edge,
Reimman Scattering,
superstrings
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment