Part Nine of Session Six of Course 19 -- The Klein Bottle And Orbifold Differentiation

The general abelian-based wave-tug/wave-pull -- that orbifolds and orbifold eigensets use to exert their overall impedance and permittivity upon -- works to bear its topological sway upon the general universal settings, that the derived said respective given arbitrary orbifold-like phenomenologies are contingent upon, in a directly viable way.  So, for instance, if one set of orbifold eigensets is directly pertinent to the kinematic activity of one said general basis of a universal setting, then, its general abelian-based wave-tug/wave-pull works to exert specifically upon the respective universe that such a set of orbifold eigenset-based phenomenology is both active and existent in, over such a time period in which such an orbifold eigenset is differentiable in the so-eluded-to universe -- in a manner that is of a Fourier-based manner.  Those directly affiliated Clifford-based actions -- that would here directly appertain to an exponentially increased Hodge-based index, as appertaining to a directly corresponding increase in the scalar amplitude of a Hamiltonian-based pulsation, that would here involve the Fourier-based activity of both the covariant and the codeterminable activity of such so-stated orbifold eigensets -- are often directly affiliated with either a Dirac-like or a reverse-Dirac-like substringular condition, that may work to bear a tense of either a hermitian genus of topological flow or a tense of a Chern-Simmons genus of  topological flow, at the cite in which such an increase in the scalar amplitude of the local Hamiltonian-based pulsation is active in, in a kinematic manner that would here be extrapolated in the substringular.  This would then work to involve an eigenbase of substringular members -- that would here either work to be construed of as either a compactification or as a decompactification of phenomenology -- of the here directly pertinent indices of holonomic substrate.    This mentioned condition of either being of a Dirac-like, or, of a reverse-Dirac-like genus of substringular affiliation -- would here be at least in part in contingency with whether or not one is dealing with either a respective group-attractor-based eigenbase, or, with a respective ghost-inhibitor-based eigenbase, as the directly corresponding setting of consideration.  I will continue with the suspense later!  Sincerely, Sam Roach.