In light of the last post that I put into the computer, when a non-tachyoinic-oriented orbifold is to bear a nature of a spin-orbital-based metrical index, the motion of the said orbifold is to only move in such a so-eluded-to spin-orbital-based manner, by the scalar amplitude that works to correspond to the distance of one Planck-Radii. This is from whatever its initial locus of iteration is to be at, over the course of going from an initial iteration of group-related instanton -- to its immediately succeeding locus of iteration is to be at, over the course of its here given arbitrary second iteration of group-related instanton. Such an eluded-to re-delineation is to happen through the Hamiltonian-based operand, in which the so-eluded-to set of superstrings that operate in so as to perform one specific function are to be re-positioned -- to where the so-stated re-distribution will here work to move in the Lagrangian of the said orbifold, as would here be in direct consideration of the wave-tug/wave-pull that the so-eluded-to directoral permittivity of the so-stated superstrings, that work to comrpise the said orbifold, are to pulled into. This is to happen in the general direction of what would here work to appertain to the course of optimum rest or least resistance. Likewise, if any cohomology that is not tachyonic, that is to be re-delineated in a transversal-based manner -- over the course of two given arbitrary respective succeeding iterations of group-related instantons, will be pulled in such a manner -- in so that the scalar amplitude, that would here directly appertain to the distance in which such a set of ghost-based indices is to be re-delineated, will be re-distributed by a magnitude of one Planck-Length. This would here work to elude to the condition that the Hamiltonian operand, in which such a set of ghost-based indices will here be re-distributed by, over the course of the two so-stated succeeding iterations of group-related instantons, to where this will bear a wave-tug/wave-pull -- that will be brought through its correlative Lagrangian by a distance of the said scalar amount of a Planck-Length. This will happen in the general direction of the directoral topological sway, that is in the manner of optimum rest or least resistance. Also, as with an orbifold, any cohomology that is not tachyonic -- that is to be re-delineated in either a radial-based manner and/or in a spin-orbital-based manner, over the course of two given arbitrary succeeding respective iterations of group-related instantons, will be pulled in such a manner -- in so that the scalar amplitude that would here directly appertain to the distance in which such a set of ghost-based indices is to be re-delineated, will be re-distributed by a magnitude of one Planck-Radii, respectively, per each of such potential genre of delineation. Again, this would here work to elude to the condition that the Hamiltonian operand, in which such a set of ghost-based indices will here be re-distributed by, over the course of the two so-stated succeeding iterations of group-relataed instantons, will bear a wave-tug/wave-pull that will be brought through its correlative Lagrangian, by a distance of the said scalar amount of a respective Planck-Radii, either radially and/or in a spin-orbital-based manner -- in the general direction of the directoral topological sway, that is in the manner of optimum rest or least resistance.
I will continue with the suspense later! To Be Continued! Sincerely, Sam Roach.
No comments:
Post a Comment