Part Two of Test Two Solutions, Course 17, The Ricci Scalar

7)  When an orbifold bears Chern-Simmons singularities, this works to make the so-stated orbifold to be of a condition other than of a Yau-Exact genus.  Phenomena that are not of a Yau-Exact genus are not directly of a mass.  If a phenomenon is not directly of a mass, then, it is not directly of a Calabi-Yau manifold.  It is mainly phenomena that are directly of a mass, that works to directly appertain to the activity of gravity.  So, if an orbifold works to bear Chern-Simmons singularities, then, such a so-eluded-to phenomenon will not be as directly appertaining to the conditions of gravity, as other substringular manifolds that are Yau-Exact.  This would then work to cause the conditionality of phenomena that bear Chern-Simmons singularities to not be as directly influenced by the Ricci Scalar -- as phenomena that are Yau-Exact in nature, instead.

8)  If a cohomology is of a Chern-Simmons nature, then, its mappable tracing will not bear as rooted of a direct affectual nature towards the physical memory of a substringular-based phenomenology, that is effected by gravity --  as another cohomology that , instead, works to trace the activity of a Yau-Exact substringular phenomenology.  This would make such a so-stated cohomology -- that is of a Chern-Simmons nature, map-out a tracing of a substringular phenomenology that is not, per say, as effected by the Ricci Scalar as much as a mappable tracing of a Yau-Exact phenomenology.

9)  If a hermitian singularity is of a substringular phenomenology that goes from a Noether-based flow into a tachyonic flow, then, such a hermitian singularity would be, at least somewhat, of a perturbative nature.

10)  If a Chern-Simmons singularity works to map-out the tracing of a substringular phenomenology -- that goes from a Noether-based flow into a tachyonic-based flow -- when one maps-out  the time-wise motion of the alterations that would here directly appertain to such a mappable tracing, then, this would directly appertain to a kinematic perturbation of a general genus of a Chern-Simmons singularity.

11)  When there is a kinematic perturbation of a Chern-Simmons singularity -- that is of the general nature of an initial Noether-based flow -- that is drawn-into a tachyonic-based flow, then, such a phenomenology would here work to describe a certain genus of a holonomic substrate, that will at least temporarily lose at least a certain relative scalar magnitude of its effect upon the relative re-delineated basis of gravitational force.  This would then work to describe a phenomenology that at least temporarily loses some of its effect upon the Ricci Scalar (and vice-versa, over time).

12)  A kinematic perturbation of a Chern-Simmons singularity often works to describe a substringular phenomenology that goes from a Noether-based flow into a tachyonic-based flow -- while often going from a steady-state euclidean basis of delineation, into a Clifford-based expansion, that will end-up going back into a relatively steady-state euclidean basis of delineation.