Part One of the Test Solutions to Test Two of Course 17

1)  A hermitian singularity is one in which there is either no Chern-Simmons singularities  -- in one or more manners of working to determine this.

2)  A Chern-Simmons singularity is a change in the derivative, as to either the kinematic flow and/or the mappable tracing of a substringular phenomenon, that would here, either:  change in more derivatives than the number of spatial dimensions that it is traveling through -- in its directly corresponding Lagrangian path -- , and/or bear either an enharmonic extension or an enharmonic attenuation of its substringular pulse, and/or, if it is of a cohomological tracing, move as a Njenhuis projection that is pulsating off of the relative Real Reimmanian Plane.

3)  The two basic superstringular-based Chern-Simmons topological singularities, are either a Lagrangian-based singularity or a metrical-based singularity.

4)  The three basic cohomological-based Chern-Simmons singularities are either a Lagrangian-based singularity, a metrical-based singularity, and/or a Njenhuis cohomological tracing of a ghost-based indical pattern -- the latter of which may be described of as hermitian off of the Real Reimmanian Plane (a tense of being partially hermitian).

5)  A heritian-based orbifold -- if it is completely hermitian, to where it works to describe a tense of superstringular phenomena that are Yau-Exact, will be in reference to the direct existence of a mass.  It is the phenomena of mass that work most succinctly to influence the interactivity of gravity.  The Ricci Scalar is the eigenbase of that mechanism that works to drive the activity of gravity itself.

6)  Cohomologies are the mappable tracing of both the activity and the existence of substringular phenomena.  If a cohomology is completely hermitian, then, not only is it Yau-Exact, yet, it bears only Real Reimmanian-based tensors -- when under these said eigenconditions.  This will then mean that we are talking about phenomena of mass that are here able to make viable Yakawa Couplings with each other.  This would work to indicate the format of Calabi-Yau manifolds that interact as Real Reimmanian eigenstates, that bear no unattenuated Njenhuis residue.  This would then involve a relatively more Hodge-based  index, in terms of the given arbitrary genus of Ricci Scalar eigenbase -- in terms of the directly involved inter-activity  -- than if one would instead have an added clause of Njenhuis-based tensors.  (Since we would here have purely Rham-based cohomologies instead of Doubolt-based cohomologies.)

I will continue with the solutions later! Sincerely, Sam Roach.