Part Two of the Tenth Session of Course 17 About the Ricci Scalar

If any given arbitrary cohomology goes from initially being of a cylindrical-based topological-based shape -- this just insinuated cohomological traceable mapping being of a one-dimensnioal superstring of discrete energy permittivity, that is pulled through a directly associated Lagrangian that is in the general directoral tense of the so-stated one-dimensional superstring's relatively forward-holomorophic direction -- into being of a shaft-like-based topological-based shape -- the latter just mentioned insinuated cohomological traceable mapping being of a two-dimensional superstring of discrete energy permittivity, that is pulled through a directly associated Lagrangian that is in the general directoral tense of the so-stated two-dimensional superstring's relatively forward-holomorphic direction, then, the superstring that is here being discussed is going from having an initial partially hermitian-based cohomological mode, into having a Chern-Simmons-based spike in the cohomology, as the initially so-eluded-to one-dimensional superstring of discrete energy permittivity is perturbated into being of a phenomenology of a given arbitrary two-dimensional superstring of discrete energy permittivity -- over a relatively transient sequential series of iterations of group related instanton.  The cohomology of the resultant two-dimensional superstring may be of either a Yau-Exact conditionality ( a superstring with no Chern-Simmons singularities), if the resultant superstring that works to form those so-eluded-to ghost-based indices that would here work to form the shaft-like morphology of the so-stated shaft-like cohomology, is of a discrete unit of a masss -- or, if the cohomology of the resultant two-dimensional superstring may instead be of a  format of partially hermitian-based singularities, if the resultant superstring that works to form those so-eluded-to ghost-based indices that would here work to form the shaft-like morphology of the so-stated altered cohomology, is not of a discrete unit of mass.  Only superstrings of discrete units of mass are both Yau-Exact and of a Kaluza-Klein light-cone-gauge topology.  So, if the resultant so-eluded-to two-dimensional superstring that I have here been discussing is not of a discrete unit of mass, then, one is here dealing with one respective given arbitrary one-dimensional superstring of a partially hermitian-based tense of cohomological-tense, that is then perturbated out of the eluded-to initial Majorana-Weyl eigenbase of conformal invariance -- into what is then here a one-dimensional superstring of discrete energy permittvity, that will here be of a different tense of Majorana-Weyl eigenbase of conformal invariance at a different general locus, over a relatively brief group metric of directly appertaining time.  This will then here work to involve one initial tense of Chern-Simmons singularity-based genus, that will perturbate into then involving a second initial tense of Chern-Simmons singularity-based genus.  This will then work to involve one given arbitrary superstring, that is at least of a partially Chern-Simmons-based nature -- as the said superstring is undergoing an analogous Yakawa-based coupling, into what may be thought of as a Fujikawa coupling.  The main potential difference here being that this is not necessarily of a discrete unit of plain kinetic energy that is then converting into a photon (discrete unit of electromagnetic energy).I will continue with the suspense later!  Sam.