Tuesday, December 21, 2010

More About Orientable Superstrings

Hey there world, this is Samuel Roach here!  I am here to mention today a little more about orientable superstrings than I have discussed before.           

Superstrings may be determined as orientable or non-orientable via their behavior during the Bette Action and/or during the Regge Action that happens in the vicinity of the instanton that an individual superstring is differentiating in from within a brief sequence of metrics that occur within one discrete unit of what we view of as discern able time.  Whether a superstring is considered orientable or whether a superstring is considered non-orientable is based upon whether the Grassman Constant is even during the Bette Action and/or during the Regge Action.  An even Grassman Constant is the condition in which the multiplicit eigenstates of the substringular field that exists in-between a given superstring and its counterpart bear a relatively flush hermicity or not.  The multiplicit field eigenstates of the field that exists in-between a superstring and its counterpart may be relatively flush in a hermitian manner whether the Laplacian-based sum field is torsioned or not, yet also, the multiplicit field eigenstates of the field that exists in-between a superstring and its counterpart may be relatively non-homeomorphic and/or non-hermitian whether the Laplacian-based sum field is torsioned or not.  What helps to determine whether the summed field eigenstates of the field that exists in-between a superstring and its counterpart is homeomorphic and hermitian is based on if the given Laplacian integration of the field of an associated superstring bears a sequence in which the individual field eigenstates of the described field are all sequentially Ward parallel in terms of the Minkowski pointal connections that work to associate each of the multiplicitly Laplacian-based sequential eigenstates -- each of such eigenstates of which are comprised of one strand of mini-string that is attached at both ends via a small yet taut tying that exists metrically around the duration of instanton in the locus that exists in-between a superstring and its corresponding counterstring.  So, as an example, an orientable one-dimensional superstring may have a field in-between its own entity and its corresponding counterstring that is angled as a unit in one of a variety of ways, yet, as long as the given superstring is truly orientable, then, during either the Bette Action and/or during the Regge Action, the associated integrable summed field will form a plane of horizontal relatively flat lines that are straight according to the same manner of conformal dimension of the corresponding superstring that is here being described.  As another example, an orientable two-dimensional superstring may have a field that exists in-between itself and its corresponding counterstring  that is angled as a unit in one of a variety of ways, yet, as long as the given superstring is truly orientabe, then, during either the Bette Action and/or during the Regge Action, the associated integrable summed field will form a curved plane of horizontal relatively flat lines that are each sequentially parallel to each other  according to the same manner of conformal dimension of the corresponding superstring that is here being described.  Such a homeomorphic and hermitian field that exists in between a superstring and its counterstring during the Bette Action and/or during the Regge Action inevitably allows for the latter association of the given superstring with its corresponding Basis of Light right before the ensuing instanton-quaternionic-field-impulse-mode to be of such that will allow the described superstring to differentiate according to Noether Flow.  Yet, if the field in-between a superstring and its corresponding counterstring is not homeomorphic and hermitian as according to the Laplacian Ward conditions of that same superstring's conformal dimensionality, then, the latter association of the given superstring with its corresponding Basis of Light right before the ensuing instanton-quaternionic-field-impulse-mode will be of a nature that causes the described superstring to be tachyonic instead of obeying Noether Flow.              

  I believe that this is enough for now.  You have a marvelous day!  Sincerely, Samuel Roach.

No comments: