Let us initially stipulate the potential existence, of both E(3)XE(3) heterotic superstrings, as well as the potential existence, of E(5)XE(5) heterotic superstrings. Let us next say, that one were to have a given arbitrary E(3)XE(3) heterotic superstring, as taken from one universal setting, to be heuristically coupled, via the general tense of a dual binary escalation, as this is when in conjunction with a given arbitrary E(5)XE(5) heterotic superstring, as taken from another universal setting (as taken from a different universal setting, than the other said heterotic superstring was here to be taken from). Let us now suppose, that a respective "observer," were to be somehow perceiving/detecting the given arbitrary respective coupling interaction, as again, via the said respective tense, of a dual binary escalation, as taken between these two different and distinct singular examples, of both individually taken inferred genre of heterotic superstring, -- to where the said "observer," is here, in this particular given arbitrary type of an example, to be both viably and intrinsically existent, as eminently to be considered, from within the general Ward-Cauchy-Related bounds, of the respective universal setting, that is here to be innately directly associated, with the Ward-Cauchy-Related physical bounds, of the same universal setting as the earlier mentioned E(5)XE(5) example, of such a heterotic string, that is here, in this particular given arbitrary case scenario, to be coupled, via the inferred escalation, in conjunction with the earlier mentioned E(3)XE(3) heterotic string. Let us now stipulate, that the just inferred Nijenhuis nature of the said E(3)XE(3) heterotic string, is here to be of an eminently heuristic relativistic complex nature, when this is here to be taken in relation, to the respective Real Riemann(Ian) nature, of the said E(5)XE(5) (heterotic) string, of such a given arbitrary case scenario. It consequently follows, that if these two just described individually taken superstrings, that are here to be of the just stipulated general nature, are to couple as such in a heuristic manner, the resultant Yukawa Coupling, that is here to often tend to come into play, will often, at times, have the general tendency, of working to form the equivalent effect, of the same type of a general Ward-Cauchy-Related behavior, as a heuristic E(8)XE(8) heterotic superstring will often have the capability of working to express. P.S. -- As A General Potentially Oversimplified Hint: -- [(e^(3i))^2]*[(e^(5))^2] = [(e^(-9))]*[(e^(25))] = [e^16] = [e^8]*[e^8]. I WILL CONTINUE WITH THE SUSPENSE LATER! SINCERELY, SAMUEL ROACH.
No comments:
Post a Comment