Makes Me Wonder -- A Mathematical Idea About Cohomology

 The following is something, about potentially being able to mathematically determine, what the scalar-related value of a cohomology-related eigenstate may be ascribed to as, when given a certain set of initially potentially plausible bounded considerations. As analogous to the request that I had mentioned before, please let me know whether or not this math is making a reasonable amount of sense or not. Either way, it would be wonderful if you could, as well, have a viable logic to support your conclusive thoughts of judgmental conclusion. Anyways, here is an elaboration, of what has been going on about this in my mind, about this stated insinuated topic:

Let us initially say, that one is to wish to determine the scalar-related value, of a non abelian cohomology-related eigenstate, that is here to be directly appertaining to the Lagrangian-Based flow, of one discrete quantum increment of transversal energy. Let us now say, that one is also to need to know, the correlative Length of the Lagrangian-Based trace, that is to be "treaded upon," by the stated individually taken discrete unit of transversal energy, over the course in which the eigenstate that is here to be in the process of being determined, is to be "latched" upon the physical stratum, of the topological manifold of such a stated discrete increment of energy, in such a manner, to where it is here to not be in the process of being indistinguishably replaced. The equation that I came up with, for determining the Real Riemannian component, of such a general genus of a scaler value of a non abelian cohomology-related eigenstate, is:

(The Planck Constant)*(The pertinent length of the Lagrangian-Based Trace)

*(The Sine Of (e^(The Ricci Flow)))/(The number of consecutive instantons in which such an eigenstate is to be attached, without being replaced in an indistinguishably different manner).

Furthermore; 

If one is to wish to determine the Nijenhuis component of an otherwise analogous eigenstate, then, such a general type of a related value, is simply as before, EXCEPT times "i." ((-1)^.5.)

And/Or Furthermore; 

If one is to be determining an analogous value, that is, instead, to be of the discrete radial tense, then, divide the potential scalar value, of the cohomology-related eigenstate to be determined, by 2PI.

And/Or Furthermore;

If one is to be determining an analogous value, that is instead, to be of an abelian cohomology-related eigenstate, then, Utilize (The Cosine Of (e^(The Ricci Flow))) INSTEAD OF (The Sine Of (e^(The Ricci Flow))). 

Some time soon, I will describe to you specific general examples of these case scenarios, in order to be able to help you to better understand, what has been going on in my mind better. Sincerely, SAM.