Re-Iterative Alteration Of Charge

Let's initially consider a charged mass-bearing orbifold eigenset, that is here to be traveling via a path, that is iterative in its tense of Lagrangian-related flow.  The Ward-Cauchy conditions of its said iterative tense of Lagrangian-related flow is consistent, except that the propagation of the said orbifold eigenset is to go from working to bear the constraints of a unitary Lagrangian, to then working to bear the constraints of a binary Lagrangian, to then going back into working to bear the constraints of a unitary Lagrangian, and so on, -- as the propagation-related projection of the said eigenset of such a case, is to be reiterating in its tense of a flow of motion -- over a directly corresponding repetitive evenly-gauged Hamiltonian eigenmetric.  Consequently; the said orbifold eigenset of such a particular case, will then tend to go from bearing a certain scalar magnitude of cohomology-related generation, to working to bear a higher scalar magnitude of cohomology-related generation, into ensuing to bear its initial inferred scalar magnitude of cohomology-related generation, and so on, -- as the here implied set of discrete quanta of energy, that are here to operate in so as to perform one specific function, is to propagate in a repetitive tense of a path-related flow of motion, -- that is otherwise of the same general genus of substringular boundary conditions.  Such a re-iterative alteration of charge, will then tend to work to reverse-fractal into working to form a Ward-Cauchy-related tense of an initial scalar magnitude of charge, into consequently altering into working to form the reverse-fractal of a higher scalar magnitude of a Ward-Cauchy-related tense of charge, while then going back into working to form the reverse-fractal of the initially inferred scalar magnitude of a Ward-Cauchy-related tense of charge, and so on.  Such a process of a re-iterative alteration, or perturbation of charge, will tend to occur, in so long as the motion of the said orbifold eigenset, is to be consistent, With the exception of going from working to bear a unitary Lagrangian-based flow, into working to bear a binary Lagrangian-based flow, and back again, -- as the said eigenset is here to be reiterating, in its directly corresponding pattern of a flow of motion, over a discrete quantum of time.
I will continue with the suspense later! To Be Continued! Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.