How "Tightly-Knit" Your ds For Integration Is

Whether or not one is to consider a Ward-Cauchy-related condition, to be of either a Fourier-related-type situation or of a Laplacian-related-type of a situation, in part, may often be relative to how "tightly-knit" your "ds" of integration is here to be.  For instance, if you are here to be involved with an occurrance, that is here to be happening, in full, over a thousandth of a nanosecond, then, one may then concur to be able to think of charge in and of itself, in lei of being of a Laplacian-related manner of a Ward-Cauchy scenario.  Yet, if one were, instead, to be involved with an occurrance, that is here to be happening, in full, over a significantly smaller duration of time (let's say, for only 10^(-41) of a second), then, one may then concur to be able to think of charge in and of itself, in lei of being of a very tightly-knit Fourier-related manner of a Ward-Cauchy scenario.  This eludes to the general stipulation, -- that whether one is to be considering something (let's say for instance, "charge" in and of itself) to be of a Laplacian-based situation (like a snapshot), or whether one is to be considering something (let's say for instance, "charge" in and of itself) to be of a Fourier-based situation (as something that is here to be happening over a duration), is at least partially dependent upon how tightly-knit your ds of integration (the "slivers" of time, that are here to operate as the here to be considered smallest parts of time, for any one given arbitrary scenario) are to be wavered-out to be.  I will continue with the suspense later!  To Be Continued!  Sincrely, Samuel David Roach.