Saturday, September 28, 2019

A Special Case Of Placement Of Ghost-Based Inhibitor

Let us initially consider two different given arbitrary orbifold eigensets.  Each of these two said respective orbifold eigensets of such a so-stated case scenario, are to exhibit the same scalar magnitude of overall discrete energy quantum, -- as well as that each of these two said respective orbifold eigensets, are here to be exhibiting the same energy density.  Also -- each of these two said respective eigensets, are here to be working to exhibit the same specific type of wave pattern over time, -- as these are here, in this particular case,  to be moving at the same velocity, -- while; as those superstrings of discrete energy permittivity that work to comprise such a said orbifold eigenset, are, in this given arbitrary case, to bear the same tense of an embedding of Chern-Simons Invariants Upon the holonomic substrate of their stringular field density, over a given arbitrary Fourier-Transform, in a manner that is both diffeomorphic in a metric-related sense, as well being homeomorphic in a Lagrangian-related sense, over an evenly-gauged Hamiltonian eigenmetric.  This is here to be happening in such a manner, -- to where the two respective mentioned orbifold eigensets are here to be working to form a De-Rham cohomology over time, in a manner that is consequently to work to form a wave-pattern that is heuristically hermitian.  Let us next say, that there are here to be two different sets of two ghost-based inhibitors, that are to be working to effect the two different mentioned orbifold eigensets -- to where one of these sets of two ghost-based inhibitors, is here to be Yukawa to one of the said respective orbifold eigensets; while the other set of ghost-based inhibitors, is here to be Yukawa to the other said respective orbifold eigenset.  Let us next stipulate, that each of the individually taken sets of ghost-based inhibitors, is here to bear the same tense of a covariant-related nature -- toward each of the individually taken orbifold eigensets, that these two different respective ghost-based inhibitors are here to be Yukawa towards, over the inferred evenly-gauged Hamiltonian eigenmetric.  This is to where, in this given arbitrary case, there is here to be an insinuated cohomology-related degeneration, that is here to ensue upon each of these two said respective orbifold eigensets, over time.  Let us next say, that each set of ghost-based inhibitors, are here to be in such a state of a condition, to where their Yukawa-related effect is here to be quantized.  Consequently, even if one were to theoretically, in a Laplacian-related manner, -- to have the specific proximal local positioning of the two different ghost-based inhibitors to be switched "instantaneously," for both of the two sets of ghost-based inhibitors, (to where, one of these two sets of ghost-based inhibitors is to be acting upon one of the said respective orbifold eigensets of this respective case, while the other set of ghost-based inhibitors is to be acting upon the other said respective orbifold eigenset of this case), the overall effect of the degeneration of cohomology, that is here to be happening to each of the two different orbifold eigensets, when this is here to be taken over the inferred proscribed evenly-gauged Hamiltonian eigenmetric, -- will then tend to bear the same tense of a degenerative effect, over the so-eluded-to Fourier Transform -- in which this case scenario is here to be happening.  To Be Continued!  Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.

No comments: