A Little As To Abelian Verus Non Abelian Groups

When one is dealing with a phenomenology that works to display a symplectic geometry -- such a so-eluded-to homology, that is thence formed by the interaction of the said string's topology with its immediately proximal norm-state-projections, is then to be directly corresponding to a closed-looped superstring of discrete energy permittivity, -- of which is here to be a cohomology, of which is here to have a grouping of abelian eigenindices, that work to form the structure of its homology-related framework, as this is proximal local to its external topological surface at the Poincare level.  Yet -- when one is dealing, instead, with a phenomenology that works to display a "Khovanov" geometry -- such a so-eluded-to homology, that is thence formed by the interaction of the said string's topology with its immediately proximal norm-state-projections, is then to be directly corresponding to either an open-looped superstring or an open-looped strand of discrete energy permittivity, -- of which is here to be a Legendre homology, of which is here to have a grouping of non abelian eigenindices, that work to form the structure of its homology-related framework, as this is proximal to its external topological surface at the Poincare level.  Furthermore, as I have inferred to before -- an abelian group works to form a direct wave-tug-related interaction with the respective phenomenology that it is to come into contact with, -- whereas, a non abelian group works to form an indirect wave-tug-related interaction with the respective phenomenology that it is to come into contact with.  Consequently, the process of the indistinguishably different recycling of non abelian groupings -- that work to form the homology-related shell of Legendre-related geometric phenomena -- are here to be recycled relatively more swiftly, whereas the process of the indistinguishably different recycling of abelian groupings -- that work to form the cohomology-related shell of symplectic-related geometric phenomena -- are here to be recycled relatively less swiftly.  Abelian groupings are brought into the Ward-Neumman bounds of the relatively proximal local region of a closed-looped genus of substringular phenomenology -- because, when a bosonic string is to interact with those norm-state-projections that it is to come into contact with, -- such a consequent interaction tends to be of a relatively orthogonal nature, -- whereas, non abelian groupings are brought into the Ward-Neumman bounds of the relatively proximal local region of either an open-looped or an open-strand genus of substringular phenomenology -- because, when a fermionic string is to interact with those norm-state-projections that it is to come into contact with, -- such a consequent interaction tends to be of a relatively oblique nature.
I will continue with the suspense later!  To Be Continued!  Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.