Take a bosonic mass-bearing superstring, as it is going through an iteration of BRST. Consider the general "gist" of both the said superstring's topological mappable sway, as well as the general "gist" of the mild vibratory oscillation that it is to display, during the said iteration of BRST -- when this is to take into consideration the Polyakov Action eigenstate that such a said superstring is here to exhibit, -- when given its scalar amplitude of that Lorentz-Four-Contraction that it is to display, at that given arbitrary respective iteration of BRST -- that is of such a specific case. The correlative partition-based discrepancies that such a said superstring is to exhibit, are to be delineated just to the "side" of such a general gist, -- as I will explain in much more detail in later posts.
Hint: Such partition-based discrepancies are here to be propagated in a Laplacian-based manner in a general method of delineation, that is in the holomorphic-to-Njenhuis direction, that is to be distributed as a two-dimensional set of discrepancies that are to go from being placed: from the first partition-based discrepancy being at a holomorphic/norm-to-forward-holomorphic positioning, to the next partition-based discrepancy being placed at a reverse-holomorphic/norm-to-reverse-holomorphic positioning, to the next partition-based discrepancy to being placed at a holomorphic/norm-to-forward-holomorphic positioning, etc..., for as many partition-based discrepancies that such a said superstring is here to have. (One may simplify this case further, if one were to, instead, to have only one or two partition-based discrepancies, along the general topology of the said string.) The number of partition-based discrepancies, is to the inverse of its Lorentz-Four-Contraction. The higher the Lorentz-Four-Contraction of a string is, the less partition-based discrepancies that such an individually taken string is to have. More to be said about this later.
I will continue with the suspense later! To Be Continued! Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.
No comments:
Post a Comment