Let us consider an orbifold eigenset, that is moving into the general reverse-holomorphic direction -- in an assymptotic directorial-based manner, towards a plotting that may be mapped-out as being of a general relative y-based axion, -- to where this happens in such a manner, that may be described of as a cohomological index, that behaves as if it is moving as an eigenstate that is as well moving in a tangential manner, via a respective correlative Fourier-Transformation, that is initially being translated via an even manner of acceleration, over time. Let us initially consider that one is dealing with a "real-to-'life'" relatively planar motion (as a figure of "speech"), that is basically moving in a strictly two-dimensional manner, as the said orbifold eigenset is to approach the so-stated relative y-based axion, in an assymptotic manner, over a sequential series of instantons. Let us next consider, that at some point in time -- as the said orbifold eigenset is to then be relatively very close in proximal locus to the said mapped-out relative y-based axion, -- that the so-stated orbifold eigenset, that is to here be kinematic in displacement, via the so-eluded-to Fourier-Transformation, is to be tugged-across the Laplacian-based mapped-out y-based axion. Since this general genus of a perturbation out of the initial assymptotic mode of motion, will be an alteration out of the general genus of the so-eluded-to approach -- that had initially been tending to get nearer and nearer to the plotted-out relative respective y-based axion -- in such a manner of which is to here be moving as is according to the so-stated initial even acceleration, over the initial so-eluded-to sequential series of instantons, such a perturbation out of an assymptotic flow of the respective eigenindices of the said orbifold eigenset, will blatently work to cause a change in the initial rate of the acceleration of the said orbifold eigenset, -- to where such a genus of a kinematic-based perturbation will then work to cause a definite metrical-based Chern-Simons singularity. Yet, since we are here to be initially discussing the actual versus the theoretical -- the actual approach of the so-stated orbifold eigenset that is towards the said Laplacian-based y-based axion, -- will work to bear, in reality, an external angular momentum -- that is to work to bear more of an abelian geometry of approach than a non-abelian geometry of approach, -- since the earlier said assymptotic motion of the said orbifold eigenset towards the so-stated Laplacian-based y-based axion, is to here, only be the physical result of what is simply an approximation of an assymptotic method of behavior. (Nothing that is actually physical, is likely to just get more and more infinitely closer to any mapped-out axion, without ever to be able to spontaneously cross such a given arbitrary axion, no matter how long such an activity is to happen. So, in reality, if such an approach is to be prolonged, such an orbifold eigenset will always tend to eventually alter from the theoretical assymptotic behavior, that has here been eluded-to.) Based upon this just mentioned physical condition -- such a genus of a crossing of a Laplacian-based axion, will, in the "real world," not necessarily work to involve a Lagrangian-based Chern-Simons singularity.
I will continue with the suspense later! To Be Continued! Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.
No comments:
Post a Comment