Monday, July 11, 2016

An Additional Post On Session 14 Of Course 19 -- The Klein Bottle And Orbifold Differentiation

Most phenomena that we generally conceive of, tends to be radially dependent.  Yet -- phenomenology that is literally of a pointal-based nature at the substringular level, tends to generally be more dependent upon its respective diameter-based associations than its radial-based associations.  Do you remember that I had recently mentioned of the existence of certain literally infinitessimal point particles, that act as fabric-associated phenomenology -- that are inherent as acting as being predominantly placeholder-affiliated eigenindices of holonomic substrate, that may often torque and bend along the topological stratum by which the fabric of the relative respective proximal localized multiplicit sheet-based composition of space-time-fabric is to be intrinsically twisted and contorted -- even though these said occasionally extrapolated infinitely small point-source-based placeholders are not of the general Fourier-based nature, that would exist in so as to otherwise re-delineate, propagate, or commutate, over time.  Such so-stated infinitessimal point particles, that act as median-related singularity-like attenuated indices -- have a diameter that may be thought of as having a scalar amplitude or a scalar magnitude of "0+" meters in diameter.  In spite of the condition that such so-stated infinitely small point particles, tend to be more dependent upon their diameter than their radius, extrapolating their volume may possibly be an exception to this rule.  This would then work to mean that the volume of such an absolute minimal so-eluded-to point particle, would then work to bear the extrapolated general volume of {{4pi/3}*(0+m/2)^3}, which would then work to allow this to be the equivalence of a respective volume of {{{pi*{0+^3m^3}}/6}.  This is the way that I perceive of such a model of string theory at this "point."
I will continue with the suspense later!  To Be Continued!  Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.

No comments: