Some Additional Help

When one given arbitrary relatively more variant-based substringular motion of superstrings strikes a riven arbitrary relatively more conformally invariant-based substringular motion of superstrings -- over a given arbitrary set sequential series of group instantons -- the so-stated more conformally invariant set of substringular phenomenology will tend to bear more of a potential to be displaced, than the so-stated more variant set of substringular phenomenology.  As this so-eluded-to set of conditions happens over time, the relatively more conformally invariant set of substringular phenomenology that I have just eluded to will tend to bear less of an overall overt basis of Lorentz-Four-Contraction, while, the relatively less conformally invariant set of substringular phenomenology that I have just eluded to will tend to bear more of an overall overt basis of Lorentz-Four-Contraction.