As To Group Attractors

I am about to start to explain the idea behind what a group attractor eigenmatrix of directly associated strings is, as such an eigenmatrix acts as one group trait encodement.:  Let us initially say that three superstrings of discrete energy permittivity function as one homotopic-based trait -- as an orbifold -- of which devolves the basis of one particular unique holonomic substrate.  Two of the so-eluded-to strings that are eigen to the directly associated homotopy are one-dimensional, and work to form a cohomology that acts as a dually bound  conical-shaped mappable tracing, that forms a core-field-density that bears a closing of the otherwise open looping, while one of the so-eluded-to strings that are eigen to the directly associated homotopy are two-dimensional -- and works to form a core-field-density that acts as an integration of a large Hodge-Index of  toroidal-based eigenstates of morphology, that, when such eigenstates come together, work to form a shaft-like mappable tracing that may be extrapolated as a shaft-like appendage to the so-eluded-to general homotopic index.  This just mentioned compilation of cohomological indices acts over time, in so as to form a kinematic display that acts as a series of covariant cyclic permutation -- that works to form an eigenbase that may be implemented as a revolution of proximal ordering - when it comes to the nth delineation of what would here involve the kinematic activity of the so-mentioned two-dimensional string, in this given arbitrary case that I am discussing here.  As the so-mentioned eigenbase of homotopic cohomological-based index is being redefined, over the succession of each iterative and reiterative covariant-based occurrance of group instanton, the three so-mentioned superstrings of discrete energy permittivity that I have mentioned here in this case will here involve a discrete genus of overall wave-tug permittivity -- that will work to cause all three of such directly associated superstrings to bear a condition of being detectable as being proximal in the globally distinguishable.  Yet, when the three here mentioned superstrings of such a case scenario are not initially detectable as being proximal in the globally distinguishable -- in such a manner to where such so-stated superstrings will gradually  work to bear a direct Ward-Cauchy kinematic basis of differentiation, that would here involve the same tense of imagination (the directly associated wobbling of the correlative Fadeev-Popov-Trace eigenstates, are to alter, in so as to then be of the same Real Riemannian Gaussian Translation, amongst the three so-eluded-to discrete units of energy, to where all three directly associated strings will then act as three subspaces that are then of the same universal setting) -- the here directly involved superstrings' unique differential clause, in terms of the correlative covariant wave-interaction,  will gradually work to make these so-stated directly associated strings to eventually act as being adjacent in the globally distinguishable, over time.
I will continue with the suspense later!  To be continued!  Sincerely, Sam.