Part Three as to Substringular Fields, a Special Case

So, describe the successive reiterations of a one-dimensional superstring -- as it approximates a neighborhood in the substringular.  A collection of field-oriented physical point particles come together in a differential association, due to a resultant wave-tug of attractor groups and repulsive semi-group-based tensors.  As the directly associated first-ordered point particles work to maximize their repulsion-based potential -- in terms of minimal field variation allowances -- the so-stated first-ordered point particles are "momentarily" slowed, with respect to their path trajectoral tenses, and, are configured, in terms of sets of linear-based phenomena, that either approximate an orbital-based field or a group line.  ( This line, being delineated as is according to the general curvature of space-time-fabric, and not a Wilson-based linearity here.)  Once the given first-ordered point particles propagate their center-state indices -- as part of the activity of the basis of light's general function -- the so-stated points then work to physically dissociate, causing these points to go along with their respective substringular-based composites in so as to go around the Ultimon, during the generally unnoticed portion of Ultimon Flow.  In the general case of conformal invariance, these said points will not then reiterate in the exact same relative localization at the ensuing iterations of group instanton, yet, will shift back-and-forth or side-to-side -- relative to their orientation with the other phenomena of the Continuum.  This is as the so-eluded-to partial components of the just-eluded-to superstrings of discrete energy permittivity are indistinguishably replenished, over the course of the recycling of norm-based states --  in the process of Cassimer Invariance.  This process works to form indistinguishably different component parts of superstrings, in despite of any case of the kinematic differentiation of space and time -- whether the directly associated superstrings are perturbative, conformally invariant, or superconformally invariant.  When one considers the Lorentz-Four-Contraction-based topological sways of the directly correlative superstrings -- in both the radial-based and the transversally-based tensorisms, the given partial integration of each respective "inverse-Laplaced" majorized plane sector will work to condone the reiteration of the eluded-to resultant wave-pointal-tug that would here exist at each particular relative locus that the correlative superstrings of discrete energy permittivity bear, for each kinematic eigenbasis of differential successive series of group instanton that the given so-stated point particles are associated with -- at the relative neighborhood of the "conjoining spots" that the locant of pointal-based variation of parameters works to radiate the eluded-to linear-based approximations of each respective one-dimensional superstring.  This happens, so that the only viably measurable location of the so-stated detectible superstring will then here bear a circular-based core-field-density -- that may often bear the potential of conical-shaped physical abberations.  This is the case for any core-field-density of a one-dimensional superstring that is superconformally invariant at a set established extrapolatable locus -- even if the said one-dimensional superstring bears little to no swivel-based abberations.  Any non-perturbative core-field-density of a one-dimensional superstring of discrete energy pemittivity that is conformally invariant is likely to not bear any extrapolatable swivel-shaped-based abberations, anyhow.  This resulant orbital-based kinematic motion of two one-dimensional superstrings, whose Gliossi-based fields that are Poincaire to the topology of the said superstrings, are orphogonal to the cross-section of such an implied Hamiltonian-based general field-density -- when one maps-out this so-stated cross-section in the relative forward-holomorphic direction.  This works to form a relatively local field that is comprised of the orbital kinematic differential activity of two superstrings that are moving as I have here described -- that works to directly associate with three toroidal-based fields that act as the core-field-density of three respective two-dimensional superstrings, whose Gliossi-based field that is Poincaire to the topology of the said superstrings in a flush Laplacian-based setting.  This is in so that this may form an orbital field, that, again, may form an overall Hamiltonian-based orbifold-based field that is either elliptical, parabollic, and/or a cyclically permutative field that alters from an elliptical-based field to a parabollic-based field over time.